It appears Meta’s Horizon Worlds may literally and figuratively not have legs after all.

  • golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    13 小时前

    It’s funny because the meta quest recently had an update that got rid of custom/user created environments for the home area and only gave you some shitty options. The default one was a shitty balcony that overlooked a big stupid tower advertising this and they made the “portal” to it permanent and unremoveable.

    In addition to this almost every time you opened a menu it would pop up a fucking ad/link to enter the application almost every time.

    Pretty sure now this was a desperate last ditch effort to try to increase traffic - but clearly NO ONE wanted it and it just pissed everyone off more.

    If they want to save face to any degree they should revert that fucking patch ASAP. I miss my home environment being a fucking derelict warehouse.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      39 分钟前

      I miss my original Oculus Home. Had a nice arrangement of furniture, a shooting range, a little shelf that held virtual cartridges of all my games, various little statues and trophies that you could display for achievements… and they just got rid of it all.

      Immediately killed any interest I had in customizing my virtual space. Why bother if they’re just going to rug pull it at any time. They could’ve at least let us continue to visit it “offline”.

    • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 小时前

      It always amazes me that some executives think that taking away customization is the way to get more traffic instead of driving away to people who put effort into making a customized thing

      • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 小时前

        It amazes me that so many people bought this product from Meta. When the Oculus Rift was first announced I was so excited and hopeful that we were finally going to get VR right… then they got bought by Facebook and I knew right then that I’d never own one. Here’s hoping the new Steam headset can live up to the hype.

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    22 小时前

    It’s funny how almost everyone from FAANG is failing hard in the gaming space. Like Google fails with Stadia, Amazon shutdown how many game studios, Netflix shutdown that studio that were making a Squidgame game and the Zuck dumped billions into the metaverse void. Looks like the Silicon Valley way of doing business just doesn’t work in the games industry.

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    23 小时前

    VRChat is the most popular “metaverse” and it’s still growing every year.

    So it’s weird to call the metaverse dead when Horizon wasn’t even in the lead among its competitors.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 小时前

      I get your point, I genuinely do. But the way the general public uses the term metaverse is to refer to Horizon, not that style of game/app in general.

    • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      16 小时前

      VRChat is not owned by meta, therefore not part of the meta verse.

      Metaverse is not the same as VR.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    1 天前

    Meta (the company hilariously rebranded with this non-sense as their foundation) has moved on to the next grift: AI and mobile video surveillance devices.

    • James R Kirk@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      13 小时前

      I love that they changed their name to show how serious they were about the metaverse being the future of tech and it never even came close to being a thing.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 天前

        Sure, but I did specifically say mobile video surveillance. Pretty sure their goal is to reduce the friction of taking out your phone to start capturing a video.

        I’ve already ended a friendship over these stupid things.

      • Miaou@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 小时前

        Considering they developed the framework everybody builds upon nowadays, I doubt it.

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 小时前

        They’ve been in the AI game for about as long as everyone else. I would consider their lab to be one of the best in CV tech.

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 天前

    Metaverse was like the AI nobody asked for getting pushed into apps. Nobody wanted Wii Mii like hangout rooms where you have to water a clunky headset.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 天前

      Metaverse was like the AI nobody asked for getting pushed into apps. Nobody wanted Wii Mii like hangout rooms where you have to water a clunky headset.

      I was willing to give a shot to something like the Metaverse, but the instant I heard it was a Facebook/Meta project I had zero interest and hoped it would die. This was my same experience with Occulus. These are both technologies I want for a cyberpunk future, but Facebook cannot be the one to control them.

      • bystander@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 天前

        One of the main oculus guy of Oculus stuck around after the buy out, until a couple years ago and rage quit. Because he said that Meta is killing it. So yeah.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 小时前

          They are killing it, but sadly they’re about the only ones keeping it alive, at least at an affordable price.

          I wish VR was a commodity product, like TVs. Everything compatible with everything.

  • onnekas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 小时前

    Say ‘goodbye’ already??

    I never got to say ‘hello’ in the first place!!

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 小时前

    Oh no! Shock! I would rather join MySpace before I purchased a house in the “metaverse”.

    • bus_factor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 天前

      May I ask why? It seems like a huge risk due to being tethered to a Facebook account which could get banned at any time. Was the price too good to pass up?

      • Anivia@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 天前

        They pretty much have a monopoly on standalone VR headsets atm.

        With a throwaway meta account and ADB you can make it somewhat less of a privacy nightmare

        • bus_factor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 天前

          Ah. I guess that’s why people were so excited about Valve making one. I’m not really that interested in VR, so I never really evaluated their vs the competition’s offerings.

          • stephen01king@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            23 小时前

            Valve is still not making one that can do AR, so we’re still stuck with either Meta or Pico for that use case.

            • fartsparkles@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              21 小时前

              Not entirely true. They’ll have black and white cameras at launch and have an expansion port on the front of the device for potential color cameras in the future.

              They just said AR isn’t their focus for this device, not that it isn’t possible.

              And I get it - everyone I know that already has XR headsets doesn’t bother with AR as the experiences are limited (and I imagine the union between AR gamers and tidy environments with clear surfaces is pretty small).

              • stephen01king@piefed.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                20 小时前

                I expect them not to focus on AR as the biggest usecase for it is for virtual monitor in a real life environment and not gaming. Maybe the give us a colour camera add-on, but I doubt it’ll be their focus from the get-go.

  • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 天前

    The metaverse, in some form, is nearly inevitable IMO. But it’ll be a federated-like infrastructure and I’m very glad Facebook will have fuck all to do with it.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 天前

        Not them, but I think I’ve got a bead on it, assuming you treat it as a general concept and not a trademark:

        It’s basically the Platonic ideal of a game lobby. Kinda like what Miiverse was supposed to be, or Ready Player One. They were both after my time but I think maybe kinda like Club Penguin or Roblox? Like an overworld with a custom avatar that you can socialize in and sync into other apps or games together.

        It does seem basically inevitable, fast forward gaming 10 years and I’d be surprised if something like that wasn’t the norm.

      • Malgas@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 天前

        Like many crappy things these days, the name and some of the concept were stolen from good sci-fi. Snow Crash, in this case, in which it was as if the entire Internet was VR.

        Which, the Web barely existed when that book was written, so wild visions of what the Internet might turn out to be were to be expected. And something like it remains a common cyberpunk trope to this day.

        That said, I disagree with the other poster that it will ever happen, let alone is inevitable.

        • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 天前

          Also, one of the protagonists of that book lives in a storage unit with a roommate works five jobs and uses a pay toilet across the street¹ despite having worked at multiple wildly valuable start-ups. It is not a novel about good things or a good future.

          ¹at which he can’t afford the premium subscriotion that has toilet paper

          • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            22 小时前

            It is not a novel about good things or a good future.

            If I recall correctly, Snow Crash expands upon Stephenson’s short The Great Simoleon Caper in which the US Government tries and fails to delay its inevitable bankrupting as its citizens evade taxes en masse by using cryptocurrency. The full anarcho-capitalistic collapse and dissolving of centralized powers continues in the sequel Diamond Age when automated education at-scale finally becomes creative enough to invent machines capable of bypassing the last technological barriers against printing weapons of mass destruction. Usually, I’m in support of stories in which centralized power is decentralized and fewer people are in command; Stephenson’s works of fiction explore this space but with armchair passivity, neither arguing for or against the politics of their fictional characters. In this sense Stephenson is conservative; post-cyberpunk instead of solarpunk. Stephenson is more likely to blow up the Moon, kill all the main characters, or fast-forward three thousand years than to try and dream up a plausible pathway for us, the readers, to live in a world not controlled by billionaires. This is why you hear so much of Stephenson from the likes of Microsoft or Facebook; socialist alternative stories such as those by Kim Stanley Robinson tend to recommend assassinating billionaires or purposefully collapsing the housing market for the sake of preventing billions of deaths from climate change, all prospects that are not profitable to the ultra wealthy such as Jeff Bezos who hired Stephenson as a consultant for their rocket company, Blue Origin.

            • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              22 小时前

              I don’t recall those novels being explicitly sequels, but maybe?

              He’s not a Utopian, but that’s part of the point. They’re doing torment nexuses. Silicon valley is just the torment nexus place.

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 天前

      But it’ll be a federated-like infrastructure

      Unfortunately I don’t see any guarantees for this. Unless the incentives that led to the enshittification of the internet disappear, the Metaverse will probably eventually look and function much the same. It really is that predictable.

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 小时前

        Meta couldn’t make their digital shopping mall work with unlimited money. Tailscale made hosting from home 100x easier. Federation protocols are maturing. It’s fundamentally no different from hosting a Minecraft server, which even kids do

      • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        19 小时前

        Perhaps an open set of standards at the least. Some form of super-oauth would be required but I should have clarified that the openness of a true federation-like model is aspirational: invisioned as a conscious and intentional rejection of the ever-increasing monetization, financialization, and enshittification of all mediums of social interaction.

        People didn’t jump on the FB metaverse partly because it was shit, but partly because it was painfully obvious it was full of grift and a billionaire’s wet dream of further social monopolization. From the moment it was pitched, no one (but people who stood to gain) thought it would succeed. The friction and frustration has been increasing. The world falling apart makes the little nagging annoyances just that much more irritating, and people are starting to actively resist them rather than just rant and succumb. Social pressures are starting to move the needle too.

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        23 小时前

        Yea, and asset ownership will make federated Social VR awkward. As in, few will put in time making spaces and games that can be instantly duplicated and rehosted.

        It’s an upside that platforms have, they can do at least some moderation regarding content theft. It’s never perfect, but it’s better than a free for all.

  • Carl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 天前

    For real, they should have either bought or cloned VRChat as a first step, and then looked into expanding from there. That shit is a metaverse that people willing go into primarily because it enables a ton of free expression.