• JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Just think about how hard the current energy crisis would hit us if we still would produce hundred percent of our electricity with fossil fuels.

    • Melchior@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Just think about Iran being able to deal with protests, without the oil money funding the government. It is also not just Iran.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Coal enters the chat.
      It’s dirty but it’s cheap. So if price and supply are the main worries, coal would be an excellent option.

      • Kkk2237pl@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        Mining costs are not cheap. In Poland real price of coal is 300eur /MWh. Only coal, but we need to burn it in power plant…

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          IIRC it’s still a bit cheaper than gas, but pretty close.

          If exchange rates come into play it can of course get a lot more stark. Like, North Korea probably burns coal in anything humanly possible. They don’t have domestic oil, and forex to buy things is precious to them.