• folaht@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    I have a better solution.
    Why not build a long city from Pickup point to Drop Off point,
    with two rows of 500 meter tall skyscrapers to shield Iranian drones from entering,
    and then have an oil pipeline go through it in the middle?

    I call it, ‘the line’.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Why don’t they just America the whole fucking place, then they can just America the oil through the Strait of America, and do whatever the fuck they want.

      Which I guess is kind of the plan if Israel is going to spawn kill every new guy until they are wearing the right colors.

  • GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    look, we can totally do this. get your grandma’s '97 corolla, throw a few barrels in the trunk and a few on the roof, and get driving. If it runs out of gas, just refine some of the oil and fill up! If it’s due for an oil change, just throw some of the oil in!

  • MoonMelon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 day ago

    People just don’t understand the scale of these global systems, which is understandable since the numbers are incomprehensible. They think what they see in daily life represents one cell of a giant organism, but its more like one atom.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    What if they set up a ramp in front of the mountains and get the boat going really really fast?

  • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    A barrel of oil is about 160 litres, and the biggest liquid transporter trucks usually hold about 60000 litres. That’s 375 barrels per truck.

    This ain’t going to work.

          • rafoix@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            1 day ago

            There is no reason to spend billions of dollars on a rail line that is not needed as long as Zionists do not start an unnecessary war.

            Maybe Zionists could stop their death cult beliefs instead of making the rest of us pay for their psycho-fairy tale crap.

              • rafoix@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                22 hours ago

                It seems like those psychopaths know that their control of America politics is on its last leg so they’re willing to start any war even without the multi-year propaganda campaign that the last major war had.

              • rafoix@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                16
                ·
                1 day ago

                Did I ever mention the rail vs road cost? Two massively dumb ideas that are infinitely worse than just not killing Iranians.

                It’s actually very easy to not kill people and raise energy prices worldwide.

              • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                not blowing things up unnecessarily costs way less than any building projects. Even if the rails were built, not a lot of things are stopping it from getting struck by missiles.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 day ago

            I think you’re underestimating the sheer scale of the endeavor. It would need to cross several deserts, a mountain range and an international border. As drawn in the image there’s almost 800km, let’s say, between Abu dabi and Al Ashkara. Being very generous with the geography, a costly project like this could run for $10 MM per Km or about $8 Bn just for the construction (probably more as it would not be a straight line), plus maintenance (in this place it could be up to 30% of the construction cost a year), plus rolling stock and operation costs. Feeding and getting water to those workers would be a logistics nightmare in the middle of the desert. Another couple of billions for unloading and loading facilities that could handle millions of barrels daily, to be built from scratch.

            That’s before even reaching the question of timeframes. Rail can be built really fast, but fast is roughly one kilometer of rail a month. Assuming all permits, contracts and administrative load can be fast tracked (it can take years to design and approve a project of this scale), it would take 66 work years (surely distributed between several work crews) to complete a new heavy railway. Which balloons the cost by a 50% factor for each new crew to accelerate construction.

            For reference, the Australian, Adelaide to Darwin rail line is 4 times longer than this. Its construction started in 1910 and was finished in 2004. So, Oman-UAE should have this rail in place and operating no sooner than 2045 if they rush very hard.

            By the time the new rail is laid out, Israel would’ve completed their genocide of Iran.

  • tordenflesk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Give me the gasolene and I’ll spare your lives.

    Just walk away.

    I will give you safe passage in the wasteland…

  • Smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    UAE has big money and likes megaprojects, have they started digging a channel between Ras Al-Khaimah and Zaghi? Some tidy profits if they can do it.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      If these kingdoms had built a pipeline skirting the strait, I guess it would still have been susceptible to missile & drone attack, and a 500-mile long, deep-underground pipeline was out of the question.

      • Egonallanon@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I know Saudi Arabia does have and east west pipeline that they can use to ship oil out and bypass the strait I just assume it doesnt have the capacity to match all the ships that usually take all the oil.

      • Smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        A canal along that approximate path would be “only” 34km. Questionable whether that, or a 500km buried pipeline, would be easier.

    • DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I always thought an Emirati Canal would probably make a whole lot of sense whenever Iran gets uppity (or vice versa, in this case).

      Sure, it would still be susceptible to attack, but doing so would draw the UAE into war as well, and they’d have the ability to place land-based air defense along its route