- cross-posted to:
- politicalmemes@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- politicalmemes@lemmy.world
You must log in or # to comment.
On their defense, I’d be pretty curious myself to see 3 titties.
Look at that chest. Three boobs for Tue price of two.
TWO WEEKS!
What mortal could resist the call of the 3 tiddied siren?
Why is it always foot fetish? We need a total recall, to preserve our intellect
During the pandemic I frequently wished I could lose my conscience and make all kinds of money from the rabid anti-mask and anti-vax crowd. I could be so rich now.
The third boob didn’t give it away?
Given how frequently GOP conventions crash grindr, maybe the hetrosexuality is performative and they paid less attention to the boobs than you or I did.
Baby, you make me wish I had 3 hands
I swear I’ve met way too many people who developed an early fetish from this because it was the first boobs they’d seen.
Yep that’s the one
The lighting does look a little weird
Other elements make it look overcast but the lighting on the chest implies direct sunlight partially obscured by the car
Her shirt is partially wet. Maybe she was carrying a jug of oil for the lesbian oil fights and it leaked partially over her right boob. No big deal for a sexy soldier!
“Yes, I know it’s paper mâché, I don’t care!”
That and the 6 toes
I do kind of see the possibility of 6 toes. It is a bit blurry.
I don’t see 6 toes but I see feet that are based on a mishmash of men’s and women’s feet
She looks like the chick with three tits in the bar from the first Total Recall
They made a sequel to total recall? 😕
2012 remake, haven’t watched it the reviews weren’t good enough
It’s bad, not worth your time.
The reasons not to watch it are legion.
deleted by creator
It has 3 tiddies lol
FACT CHECK:
Un-shocking tldr: X account is spreading misinfo
Source article: https://www.msn.com/en-us/technology/artificial-intelligence/maga-men-swindled-by-ai-model/ar-AA1Yvein
Original picture (note the human number of mammaries):
Nothing says “serious journalism” like that article censoring the term “foot fetish”.
I’ll be honest, the real pictures would fool me. The era where you could tell by the number of fingers or toes is gone, apparently. She does seem to change military branches a bit too often to be realistic. And, her colleagues seem a bit too unbothered by someone taking a picture of her with her shoes and socks off and feet up on a desk in an apparent military setting. But there aren’t any pictures I glance at and think “oh, that’s obviously AI”.
My only immediate reaction would be “The fuck is that badge thing” followed by “why is the car British and why are there plate carriers strapped to the seats”. But otherwise I would initially think it’s just low quality slop, especially after the IDF thirst trap propaganda trend.
I don’t know what modern military wear is. The badge thing seems strange, but I don’t know if it’s wrong. I can imagine putting plate carriers on the seats to dry them out if it has been hot and sweaty, but I don’t know if that’s actually common. As for the car, I would guess there are places where they might use what’s available locally, and who knows what that would be.
You have to admit that it’s at least high-quality slop. No extra hands, no extra toes or fingers. No text that is obviously slop.
High quality? Yes. Good under scrutiny? Absolutely fucking not.
Just to further my the points I made. The badge is stupid and indistinct also why the fuck would they be wearing it in fatigues. The plate carriers are strapped to the seats in a way I’m not even sure would be possible for their size. And the car is a fucking mess of random design elements and even eras, this one is hard to put into words but the interior has bits taken from GM cars, Land Rovers, and even some Toyota elements, also the vents are all fucked.
Point is that you can easily rip this image apart if you just look for things that just don’t make sense. Hell the plate carriers alone being strapped that tightly to the seats are fucking weird.
if you just look for things that just don’t make sense.
Do we have to do that with every image we see now? I would bet that a real image also has a lot of things that don’t make sense. I feel sorry for people who genuinely have 6 fingers. It’s rare, but it happens.
No not really, most of the AI slop out there is still obviously flawed in some ways that are obvious. Liquids, consistent backgrounds, and general weirdness can all be solid signs but none of these things are individually signs of AI. Honestly the best way to pick it out isn’t any individual but of weirdness but compounding weirdness, this image for example has the plate carriers, no door handle on the car, the interior having multiple manufacturers design elements, the stupid badge, and that I can’t define what’s going on in the background. Any one of these could just be weird but together is a general tell tale of AI.
Reminds me of people who proclaim AI can’t code for shit.
I wonder if they’ve used Claude or Codex in the last ~3 months.
Knockout
I have and while it seems to be doing a decent job at things I’m bad at it is far from usable for the things i’m actually good at
Which is often a sign for something not being good at anything, only you not being good at assessing something you don’t have expertise in.
See also: journalism about events you’ve actually participated in.
Yes exactly. At least for now, use the AI for things you are not expert at.
I suck at graphic design so I get nanobanana to do that for me.
For simple bugs or creating testcases or easy to describe new features, Codex does it because it does a good job 85%+ of the time saving me a lot.
For really complex race conditions or vast complex enterprise applications… I’m literally an expert at debugging, a minority of human practitioners are better than me. Ofc I do that myself.
Whilst I’ve not used those tools, I’ve used their competitors and they constantly hallucinate methods, parameters, and write pointless unit tests (as in mock a return value and then test for that return value).
4.5 kind of changed everything.
ça te branche? On s’en paye une tranche?
You mean the perfect amount?
how am i supposed to put my face between her tits if there’s another tit taking up that space i ain’t got two heads bro
That’s why Zaphod funded Eccentra Gallumbits.
Sometimes I forget lemmy was invented for people exactly like me.
It’s an old reference sir, but it checks out.
Old? How dare you, sir?
You don’t? Commit to intense yoga and stretching and one day you might get there. I have faith in you.
He should try tai-chi walking lol
A handful of titties
They put the feet in the shot to distract from the three boobs.
I came here to say the same thing. Not tiddies, triddies.
Wouldn’t that make the former “duoddies”, then?
Should have been a giveaway, but those people aren’t the sharpest tools in the shed.
First thing I noticed. Like, come ON.
threeddies
Incredibly surprising that the AI did the feet better than the titsNevermind the photo in the OP is altered to look more fake. Most reliable X post
What the hell is that on her chest? That should have been a dead giveaway but Magats be Magats. Sex is baaaaaad and siiiinnn, but we happily pay money to AI OnlyFans accounts!
Even when there’s 3
That’s what I immediately thought of!
They must be the easiest people to scam
Seeing as how they got scammed into voting into :: waves hands at everything :: this, yeah. 100%, without a doubt, we have a huge voting block that are also marks for grift after nationalism-flavored grift.
Joking aside, if we want long-term solutions, we absolutely must get to the bottom of how that keeps happening.
If we can scam them out of all their money wouldn’t that be a win-win?
Well there is that thing where for the entirety of my 50 plus years on this Earth, the conservatives have been striving to destroy public education
I am not even fucking kidding you. In times of desperation, I do think “Man… I ain’t pretty, I ain’t smart, I got no quick ways to make money except… scamming a bunch of morons”
I’m confused, how is this stealing? They paid for pictures, they got pictures.
It’s “stealing” from people who were born with pretty privilege.
Strictly speaking, AI images violate OnlyFans terms of service.
But otherwise, sure. Who was actually harmed here? If she’d been real, would this have been better somehow?
I’m having a flashback to Total Recall
Going to have to try and find the copy I have on VHS with all this Recall talk…
You don’t recall where you left it?
Yep militaristic propaganda using “sexy” women is widespread and disgusting from the US to Israel though they usually manage not to use such obvious ai.
