• 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This looks like another angle of the one we knew about - before going into this we had 16 of these, with one destroyed, we’re down to 15.

    Is this being asserted as being a second AWACS aircraft hit putting us down to 14 now?

    It looks to me like just the other side of the one we already knew about.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        AFAIK, 5 aircraft total got wrecked, but just the one was the AWACS.

        Others could have been any kind of aircraft.

        • facelessbs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          And the thing is most people do not understand how valuable that asset is to the military. They are just as important as the fuel takers. Information and logistics more important than most think.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I have also heard that yeah, we’re down to 14 now, Saagar was freaking out about it on Breaking Points.

      They also had a US Mil, guy who opposed Iraq 03, used to do a lot of war gaming, tail end of the show.

      Larry Wilkerson, former chief of staff for Colin Powell.

      Yeah remember those two tankers that apparently had a midair collison not too long ago, one went down with all souls aboard?

      He said it was due to a shoulder fired missile.

      Way I read that is some militia in Iraq brushed off their emergency Stinger, for a special occasion.

      Fairly sure an Iraqi militia group claimed credit for it not long after it happened.

      The Green Zone in Iraq has also been… people are just flying bomb drones into it, blowing shit up inside the fortress/embassy.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ah well. I’m sure all those millions of school children will be happy to go without lunch for a few months to pay for a new one.

        • NABDad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Charging them interest on the costs of the lunch that they weren’t going to receive is definitely going above and beyond!

        • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          Raytheon said they can increase production rates to meet the new demand by changing the distribution in components.

          One model is laser-focused on payload and guidance without the uneccessary extravagance of engine or fuselage, Type B is designed for complimentary tactical versatility with engine and fuselage but avoiding the burdensome payload or guidance. Additional models are coming next quarter.

          Thanks to these and other advanced enovashuns ™, Raytheon reports 100% production increases and 50% weight savings.

          Naturally this will all be offset by dynamic surge pricing, another Raytheon enovashun ™, so the units will be priced somewhere between $250 million USD and California.

  • Foni@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Could this delay the invasion or does it only affect air operations?
    Well, I know that one thing is linked to the other, but I mean, is it going to be serious enough to delay a ground operation?

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Potentially, if they don’t have enough other AWACS aircraft, and don’t have the coverage they would like.

      At best, it’s half a billion dollars down the tube.

      • Estiar@sh.itjust.worksM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        AWACS are spread over the world though and they need to keep some of these for maintenance. The readiness rate, meaning the ones that can fly missions is 56% which is actually rather high. Still what that means is they might have dozens, but that means only one dozen that are mission capable.

        It’s not a crisis but it hurts

    • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      24 hours ago

      It depends, if the US wants to air drop paratroopers in. If so, they probably move them further away to Jordan or maybe even some base in Europe. But I doubt this would delay operations. It might be better to just drop them and then move the planes out of harms way.

      But the AWACS is not closely related to ground operations. So the loss of the Sentry is not going to hurt that much.