You@feddit.org to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 1 个月前UK moves to ban smoking for everyone born after 2008www.dw.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1162cross-posted to: worldnews@lemmit.onlineglobalnews@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1162external-linkUK moves to ban smoking for everyone born after 2008www.dw.comYou@feddit.org to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 1 个月前message-square37fedilinkcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmit.onlineglobalnews@lemmy.zip
minus-squarehopesdead@startrek.websitecakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 个月前Why not just ban smoking?
minus-squarecadekat@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·1 个月前If I were to guess, it’s because a blanket ban would turn the people who actually go out and vote against you.
minus-squaretomenzgg@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 个月前I’d’ve assumed the addiction factor. Forcing an addict to quit could cause stress that won’t be present for those who haven’t started, yet. But literally just a guess, on my part.
minus-squarejenesaisquoi@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 个月前Because of the existing addicts. It would create a black market.
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 个月前Because people don’t like to be told what to do. Why create a black market when there is already a steep and steady decline?
Why not just ban smoking?
If I were to guess, it’s because a blanket ban would turn the people who actually go out and vote against you.
I’d’ve assumed the addiction factor. Forcing an addict to quit could cause stress that won’t be present for those who haven’t started, yet.
But literally just a guess, on my part.
Because of the existing addicts. It would create a black market.
Because people don’t like to be told what to do. Why create a black market when there is already a steep and steady decline?