Lemmy.one
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
lucidity [any, null/void]@hexbear.net to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 days ago

UAE Leaving OPEC

hexbear.net

message-square
29
fedilink
129

UAE Leaving OPEC

hexbear.net

lucidity [any, null/void]@hexbear.net to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 days ago
message-square
29
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Noodles4dinner [none/use any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am also leaving OPEC.

    • segfault11 [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      i was never in opec, that shit is for posers 🙄 like produce oil or don’t

  • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    2 days ago

    This feels like a big deal?

    • lucidity [any, null/void]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      2 days ago

      It makes it easier for alignment blocks to form. But one commentary I read suggest this is a reaction to a perception we are close to peak oil demand and wanting to sell as much as possible before going over that hump.

    • came_apart_at_Kmart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      2 days ago

      probably, definitely the end (or at least the beginning of the end) of an era.

      the age of royal collaboration is sunsetting and now it’s every gulf monarchy for itself!

      • jack [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        2 days ago

        the age of royal collaboration is sunsetting and now it’s every gulf monarchy for itself!

        usually when autocratic monarchies with a despotic strangehold over their people start to turn against each other during an enormous global crisis centered in their region, they are all very stable and going to remain around for a very long time

        • Jabril [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s what I’ve been telling my therapist at least

      • Crucible [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        2 days ago

        let-them-fight

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think they mostly do it to increase the amount they can extract? And also possibly to lower prices below competitor prices.

      • U7826391786239@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        i know nothing, but probably exiting so they can sell oil for yuan instead of USD

        edit: https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20260423-uae-warns-us-it-could-sell-oil-in-chinese-yuan-if-war-disrupts-dollar-flow/

        • thethirdgracchi [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          2 days ago

          No chance. The UAE are the true dogs of USAmerican empire. The Saudis very well could flip sides and sell oil in RMB, but the UAE will go down with the ship. They’re more culturally Israeli than Arab.

          • Emanuel [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t think so. The bourgeois are gonna bourgeois. All American empire dogs counted on Trump to protect them from Iran and he obviously failed. If it is more lucrative to trade with China, their bourgeoisie will do so gladly, I think.

    • TrustedFeline [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      nothing happenscels seething

      • WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        Double AND nothing

  • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 days ago

    Mr. saudi, you know what needs to be done

    • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      if saudi were rational sovereign actor (lmao), they would start funneling iranian and houthis attacks on uae, the oil price is primal for them

      • Crucible [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        2 days ago

        They were gonna be listening to rational ideas today but MBS is busy writing his screenplay like Chrissy from the Sopranos.

        HABIBTI

        Thank you!!!

        MOE

        I must be loyle to my king

        • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          mbs uncorking salafi preachers in uae like putin’s oldest vault

      • thethirdgracchi [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean just weeks before the Ramadan War kicked off, the Saudis and the Emiratis were basically engaged in a proxy war with one another in Yemen and elsewhere. Would not be surprised to see that get going again.

        • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          which would be a very convenient avenue for saudis to pursue, do the deal with houthis/south yemen puppet over al mandeb strait. unfortunately for them, that would lead to discoveries of lack of democracy, and they haven’t shown themselves to be good operators in diplomacy

  • duderium [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 days ago

    A good sign that you’re winning is when all the people on your team are turning against each other.

    • Speaker [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have some great news for Western communists, then.

      • duderium [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        😩 would anyone argue that we’re winning though?

        I would rather associate myself with the global communist movement. Western communists not so much.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Right in the dollarinos!

  • Johnny_Arson [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    OPEC? More like COPE amirite?

    • ahrienby [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      America snorting cocaine again LMAO

  • sodium_nitride [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    So functionally, they’re going to sell more oil in the future and at a cheaper price compared to competitors. Cause otherwise why leave the cartel? Also I guess this might also signal a shift to doing some non-dollar sales of oil?

    Haven’t been following the news for a week so I can only speculate that the reason for this ranges from anything from trying to please trump by lowering prices to them trying to pivot to China.

    • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s a classic case of historical materialism. There is only a couple different things that you can do, but for my money, they are going to try to seek out alternative protection. It is strange that they are leaving OPEC, but like, there could be a number of reasons. I don’t think it would be a pivot to the U.S., who just got their shit rocked, but it could be to stick it to Iran on behalf of the U.S. (they were already on the U.S.s side). The U.S. has lost the military conflict, but they could win the economic conflict. It would be rocket fuel for China, but the U.S. might (if it is rational, which they aren’t, so idk) be willing to take a solid second to China. The big problem is that I think they are underestimating the ability of countries like India, Vietnam, and Malaysia, to also use the cheap oil (and cheap solar from China) to rocket their economies. Their huge problem is lack of resources, and cheap oil means cheap resources. They have the labor force, they just need the capital goods.

  • MayoPete [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Origami Penis Enjoyer’s Club?

news@hexbear.net

news@hexbear.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !news@hexbear.net

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

  • To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).

  • To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.

  • To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don’t post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 347 users / day
  • 1.01K users / week
  • 1.89K users / month
  • 3.23K users / 6 months
  • 10 local subscribers
  • 24.7K subscribers
  • 11.1K Posts
  • 272K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Alaskaball [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
  • carpoftruth [any, any]@hexbear.net
  • Breath_Of_The_Snake [they/them, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
  • Redcuban1959 [any]@hexbear.net
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org