Link to the article here

Article text:

Darializa Avila Chevalier, the Democratic congressional nominee endorsed by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who ousted longtime Rep. Adriano Espaillat in Tuesday’s primary, maintained a since-deleted Twitter account with repeated sympathetic references to communism, Marxist ideology and Soviet figures, including Vladimir Lenin.

Avila Chevalier, a sociology PhD student whose victory sent shockwaves throughout the Democratic establishment, has been under fire for a since-deleted Twitter account, previously reported by CNN, that included phrases such as “seize the means of production,” along with calls to abolish police, prisons and borders. Other controversial tweets include one that said Black and Arab men are both “Fetishizing ugly colonizer women” and another that described wiping her dirty hands on the American flag in lieu of a napkin.

As an undergraduate, Avila Chevalier attended Columbia University, where she organized with Students for Justice in Palestine, and after graduation became involved in pro-Palestinian campus protests over Israel’s war in Gaza. She also attended a controversial October 8, 2023, pro-Palestinian rally in Times Square — one day after Hamas’ attack on Israel — that featured speeches and rhetoric praising the attack.

She previously told CNN, “I have grown considerably in the years since these tweets, and I am focused on our community and our community’s future.”

On Thursday, President Donald Trump accused Avila Chevalier of being a communist, a charge that she said she wouldn’t respond to while on MSNOW, saying, “I won’t be reactive.”

A further review of Avila Chevalier’s archived Twitter account from 2020-2022 found repeated references to communism and Marxist ideology. The account, “Darializabonet,” appears to have been deleted in June 2022.

The account’s bio read in 2020, “how communist of you.” Archived posts and retweets during this timeframe included a recommendation that Karl Marx’s Capital was an “essential must-read,” a complaint that public libraries did not carry enough Marxist literature by Lenin and other revolutionary writers, and a retweet from a Communist-identifying account lamenting that bookstore “banned books” displays did not include The Complete Works of J. V. Stalin.

One archived retweet from 2020 quoted Assata Shakur, the former Black Liberation Army member who, in 1977, was convicted in the murder of a New Jersey state trooper before later escaping prison and fleeing to Cuba. In the quote, Shakur said she “preferred Ho Chi Minh, Kim Il Sung, Che, or Fidel (Castro)” before studying Marx and Lenin because the two “white dudes” had made contributions to “revolutionary struggle” that were “too great to be ignored.”

In April 2020, Avila Chevalier shared a post lamenting that people wouldn’t accept communism over a lack of varieties of soup – a reference to the critique that the political system leads to fewer consumer choices.

“I just cannot get over the fact that the universe has foisted upon us the perfect illustration of literally every failing of capitalism and people are still like we can’t be communists cuz there won’t be enough types of soup,” the post she retweeted read.

Other posts critiqued or joked about popular culture she viewed as anti-communist.

In one post, Avila Chevalier described the animated film Anastasia as “an explicitly anti-USSR kid’s movie,” and in another post she linked to she wrote: “Time for me to once again sympathize with the people the Bolsheviks put in the blender for like 90 min 😌.”

Avila Chevalier was responding to a viral false claim that Disney had removed Anastasia from Disney+ streaming service because it was anti-Russia after the invasion of Ukraine.

In another post, Avila Chevalier joked that Sheryl Crow’s hit song Soak Up the Sun was “bootstrap capitalist propaganda” after noticing it opens with the lyric “my friend the communist,” quipping that the character was “apparently also a bad organizer lol.”

Another 2020 retweet argued for democratic worker control of wealth, dismissing ideological labels by concluding: “You can call that communism, you can call it socialism, you can call it pancakes.”

And previously, CNN had surfaced an April 2020 post where Avila-Chevalier said that while most of the political theory she had read was communist, “the pyromania associated with anarchism is very intriguing to me,” punctuating the remark with a laughing emoji.

Ok I’ll say it: these posts are hilarious. Our first lefty shitposter congressperson

  • MarxMadness [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    1 day ago

    Years ago I was reading some “is China really communist?” argument and ran across the following point:

    Whatever you think about the current character of the Chinese government, everyone there openly says they’re communist, reads a bunch of communist literature, names their main party “communist,” etc. If they aren’t communist, it’s hard to imagine a better not-already-communist place for an actual communist to rise to power.

    Something similar applies to the DSA.

    • John@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      In my experience, most critics (not all) are chronically online people who have never organized their community a day in their life.

      Most of my chapter is MLs. Please let us know when the revolution is 😎

      • free_casc [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 day ago

        I said in another post that harcorest marxistest lenisistest maoistest party in my area should have some sort of positive relationship with our local DSA, since if DSA is truly doomed to fuck up at some point due to their electoral tendencies, you’ll want to recruit everyone who is ready to step things up at that time. Obviously organize (far) beyond that, but calling people a bit to the right of you “liberal liberal liberal” is cutting off the pipeline that’s going to be very useful in the future just to be smug.

        • John@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 day ago

          The purity policing online is indeed very tiresome. I don’t witness much of that irl … people just come together to solve the problems that need to be solved.

          I work with PSL and DSA alike. This online shit is so dumb. (honestly my one PSL colleague doesn’t even really do much with PSL anymore since the org doesn’t do much other than protest marches … this comrade is is way more active in rapid response groups and immigrant solidarity orgs now)

        • Chana [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          21 hours ago

          You can actually make that kind of thing happen by just doing a joint project where the chapter is likely to fail those involved. For example, launching a police abolition campaign now. I think that’s pretty likely to get a response along the lines of “that was a good thing to jump on in 2020 but not now”. Focusing on Palestine has a similar effect.

          You don’t really need a direct relationship with DSA or whoever is on their main local committee, you just need to be known to the membership and get your events attended by them.

      • Chana [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        In my experience most critics are communists with decades of experience running parties and organizing major events.

        And I don’t mean this to be demeaning but if most of your chapter is MLs I’m guessing it is very small, like it has a small enough number of active members that a single clique of 5-10 people controls the political orientation.

    • CoolerOpposide [she/her]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I love the quote but don’t know exactly what your point is.

      Do you mean that communists can rise up through the DSA, or that the communists within DSA might as well call themselves communist, or something else?

      • MarxMadness [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 day ago

        The point about China is that even if you don’t believe they’re Real Communists, they at least all act the part, so a Real Communist could rise through the ranks more easily there than in most other places. Say you’re a Real Communist in France or Mexico, for example. If you openly talk about Lenin, or the dictatorship of the proletariat, or how labor creates all value, you’re going to have big chunks of the political sphere openly call for you to be exiled from political life, if not worse. A Real Communist will not get that pushback in China, because there everyone is at least pretending to endorse those ideas, so Real Communists have comparatively easy paths to power.

        In the DSA, everyone is at least pretending to subscribe to socialism. It’s right there in the name! So while someone who really believes that might struggle in other parties, or in the broader U.S. political sphere, they’re going to get comparatively less attacks from the right in the DSA.

        I don’t know anything about this lady. I’m saying that if there was a pretty cool politican out there, it would be easier to succeed rising through the DSA than anywhere else in the U.S.

      • ZWQbpkzl [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        The point is judging them by their initial elected is like looking at chinese markets and saying its capitalism. Rank and file DSA has always been Marxist and have only grown more radical over the years.

    • Verbalize0517 [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s ridiculous to compare the DSA to the CPC. Even if many members within the DSA claim to be communist, the DSA organization itself claims to be reformist not communist. The DSA does not put any effort in developing an independent working-class party, and they directly claim not to be a party at all. Their endorsed candidates are Democrats. There are communist parties in the US, but the DSA is clearly not one of them.

      • blobjim [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        The DSA does not put any effort in developing an independent working-class party

        obviously not true at all. DSA is literally developing its own canvassing software as we speak so that it can stop using stuff like NGP VAN.

        • Verbalize0517 [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          i-cant got me there

          Kareem Elrefai, a New York member who was elected to the NPC at the end of the convention, said that resolution was one of his biggest takeaways from the weekend, steering DSA in a power-building direction. He recounted that the body debated whether their 2028 candidate should run as a Democrat or a third-party candidate, but he was happy with the ultimate outcome. “There was an amendment that would have strongly urged us to go independent. I am very excited that it has kept us on the Democratic Party ballot line, not because I’m a proud Democrat, certainty not by any means,” he said. “Third-party agitational campaigns fail pretty consistently.”

          https://prospect.org/2025/08/14/2025-08-14-dsa-convenes-argues-and-celebrates/

          Oops! All reform!

          • ZWQbpkzl [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Ah the arrogance of youth to think that no US Marxist has ever tried to start a third party before.

            Read up on how primary systems actually work and tell me how you plan on maintaining democratic centralism when its up to both the GOP and the Dems who is register to vote in your primary and who is allowed to run in them.

            Having completely independent party infrastructure and squatting the (D) line is the way forward.

          • blobjim [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            who cares about some text on a ballot line? The DSA clearly isn’t the Democratic Party and it’s becoming less so every month. Nobody in DSA likes the Democrats. Focusing on this “break from the Democrats” stuff so closely is akin to saying, “why doesn’t China just press the communism button?” as if infrastructure, organizations, and movements are built in a day.

            Change happens slowly. This is a mostly volunteer organization. People are contributing their days off and time after work to build these things. Rhetoric will change when material reality changes.

            One cannot say “lets immediately break from the Democrats, and we declare war!” while using the fundraising and canvassing infrastructure built for the Democrats.

            • MayoPete [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              13 hours ago

              If posters here want their own party so bad they could take over the Green Party. IDK how people think because their third party has a hammer and sickle that it will somehow magically fix all the barriers third parties have in the US.

              At some point we have to realize that capitalism has put us in a “checkmate” in the US. Violent revolution is not possible with all of the surveillance and the most well armed police forces in the world. Plus half the country worships the cops. I see those stupid “thin blue line” stickers on so many trucks here. Soldiers are mostly chuds and fascists who volunteer to kill brown people overseas. Where are you getting the armed masses to fight your civil war?

              Union organization has been drilled out of people’s heads thanks to billions of $ of “individualism” and propaganda. It can work but not overnight. It’s slow work deprogramming people.

              I know Hexbear hates electoralism, but I don’t see any other options that actually can work.

      • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Aside from the fact being anything other than a reformist party is currently illegal, DSA also is not operating under a parliamentary system, it maintains independence by acting as a insurgent factional party within the two party electoral framework

        DSA chapters and cadres don’t officially share data, coordinate, or maintain organizational ties with the DNC or even non-DSA candidates they endorse (AOC’s people are Warrenites)

        DSA maintains an independent infrastructure even if it’s candidates borrow the empty label if ‘Democrat’