InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to Chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 9 days ago"Adversarial clothing": are garments designed to confuse facial recognition systems about to go mainstream?www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up138 cross-posted to: technology@lemmit.onlineprivacy@lemmy.worldprivacy@sopuli.xyzprivacy@lemmy.dbzer0.comprivacy@lemmy.ca
arrow-up138external-link"Adversarial clothing": are garments designed to confuse facial recognition systems about to go mainstream?www.theguardian.comInevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to Chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square13fedilink cross-posted to: technology@lemmit.onlineprivacy@lemmy.worldprivacy@sopuli.xyzprivacy@lemmy.dbzer0.comprivacy@lemmy.ca
minus-squarechgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-29 days agoIt’s still a camera recording. They can just have a human look at the footage if the AI produces unusual predictions. There is no way for you to check if this even remotely works against current models used by Flock or Palantir. This shit barely worked to confuse models 7 years ago.
It’s still a camera recording. They can just have a human look at the footage if the AI produces unusual predictions.
There is no way for you to check if this even remotely works against current models used by Flock or Palantir.
This shit barely worked to confuse models 7 years ago.