Is that bad?

  • scrungus [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    The only times I ever hear it anymore are in company names or advertising. Only my aged father sometimes calls it that, anyone else under retirement age just calls it a phone ime

        • miz [any, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I dunno I didn’t want OP to think I was taking a shot at them, it was an intentionally over-the-top comment but it has always bugged me how unwieldy it is to say “cellular”. it’s fine as a biology term but kind of a brick for a word you use dozens of times a day

            • ChatPPB [none/use name]@hexbear.netB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I think it would probably be a way to say, an additional few lines of adjectives without punctuation. A lot of people want adjectives with more than natural exceptions, so I would suggest reducing it on a source basis to “alternative” to “nonological beliefs” as more than a “science” or “unslamation” to further morph into any definition, “non-human purposes”, it’s much simpler. A similar definition is that it’s very simplistic. They just want to take a little break, and s * e you tohale *cockBorn.