I’ve used DuckduckGo for at least a decade. When they started embedding their little AI summary thing at the top of the chat I knew it was coming. But recently, it seems when I search anything I get tons of the same slop, SEO pumped, AI generated info pages. There was a time when I would at least stumble upon an old HTML article from a university or something. Everything sucks now. Do they even make encyclopedia books anymore?

  • ZWQbpkzl [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    5 days ago

    Internet searching was going down the tube well before AI because of SEO slop but now AI has accelerated that tremendously.

    The AI search assistant could be used to help mitigate the slop but you’re basically just having the AI sift through the bullshit for you and hope it doesn’t hallucinate some bullshit for you.

  • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    5 days ago

    Search is dead for the foreseeable future. The “alternative” engines almost entirely use the Google or bing indexes and just give a layer of privacy (that is likely broken by Google having some secret fingerprinting technique)

    Some, like DuckDuckGo, ecosia, and kagi, append the index with their own but still ultimately rely on Google and bing indexes to a significant degree. Though some of these are moving towards entirely independent indices (may take years)

    Alternatively you can look at other countries indices, which are independent: baidu (China), yandex (Russia), mojeek (uk)

    But ultimately web search is dead. Advertising and commercialization killed it. Advertising ruins everything, anyone who works in marketing should be put on a rocket and shot into the sun

      • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 days ago

        It’s better from a privacy standpoint but ultimately still depends on other search engines indices (which ultimately are largely Google and bing)

        Searxng is a meta search engine, it basically sends your query to a bunch of providers and then ranks its own results based on criteria (eg does it appear in results from multiple providers)

        I also forgot that brave has its own index, I don’t know much about it. I don’t fuck with brave stuff

        • danisth [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yes agreed. But it does give you tools that let you control how results are presented, which can help to create a good experience and remove AI results.

  • Owl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    5 days ago

    I thought they were pulling my leg, but someone recently recommended Dogpile to me and, apparently it’s 1996 again, because it’s the best search engine I’ve used in years. No AI spam, no SEO spam. Just slightly bad search results.

    • none [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 days ago

      Dogpile

      What strange twitter. A few posts from 2026 that make no sense, and before that last post was 2015.

      Looking at their explanations, they seem like a meta search provider. So if their upstream sucks, how cna they be any good?

      • Owl [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 days ago

        Dogpile is a search engine from 1996 whose gimmick was that they’d aggregate all the other search engines and get more results. They were the best briefly, before Google showed up and was so much better than all the other search engines that you’d never want to mix it with something else.

        I have no clue why Dogpile is good right now. Some strange accident?

  • SootySootySoot [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    5 days ago

    I know it’s been long coming, but this has been something I’ve noticed in the past few months. It’s impossible to find ANY human-written sources, stuff that had at least 30 seconds of a person’s time. I’ll struggle through 10, 20 even 30 pages before giving up. I’d love to know if there’s any way to exclude that stuff.

      • QuietCupcake [any, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 days ago

        Jynx, you owe me a beer!

        The thing about searxng is that it’s essentially a search engine aggregator, so it will only ever be as good as the regular search engines it’s pulling results from. Like searx isn’t doing its own searches and giving you better results than google, ddg, etc., it’s outsourcing your search to those other search engines and showing you a compilation of their results without you having to interact with them. Of course you can fine tune how it does that and choose which actual search engines it gives you results from, but it’s still ultimately search results from those primary engines. So its major benefit is privacy and all the good stuff that comes from that like no ads and not getting tracked. But if the only things that turn up on google, ddg, bing, etc., Are slop, then that’s all you’re going to get with searx as well. That said, I still highly recommend it, it’s the only thing I use for searching these days.

  • DelgadoSlims [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Use google’s verbatim mode. intitle: “index of” is also like a cheat code. In verbatim mode it gets you only documents from publicly available databases and sometimes finds you cool stuff people maybe didn’t want to share publicly

    example intitle: “index of” /pdf “media literacy”

  • Parzivus [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 days ago

    Idk if it’s just me but I generally still find what I’m looking for easily enough? You have to scroll past the paragraph of AI slop now but it’s still not too hard to find stuff generally. The HTML university websites will still come up if you’re looking for academic stuff that doesn’t exist elsewhere.

    Of course there is stuff that you can’t search, but it isn’t really Google’s fault that my private trackers don’t show up on their site