• Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    295
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a Demodex folliculorum and I’m currently dating a Demodex brevis so I’m somewhat of an expert. Our host is pretty gross and rarely showers which has made the real estate in this area really expensive. We’ve been trying to move to another host but the opportunity hasn’t come up yet. Anyway, to answer your question, we have scuba gear.

  • ALERT@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    243
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wish Lemmy would grow to the point when these Reddit moments of "I’m a dermatologist, and actually…” happen as usual as they happen on Reddit.

      • Lamhfada@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Literally three days ago nobody needed to summon a dermatologist.

        As a nerd with regular cycles of bad skin from dermatitis since my teen years I doubt nobody in a community of nerds needed to summon a dermatologist, but we may soon hit the sweet spot of being big enough to have specific expertise in comments without people lying for clout or karma farming!

    • Hubi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      1 year ago

      That used to be the case on reddit. These days you have to scroll through hundreds of lame jokes to find an actual discussion.

      • ALERT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        As far as I notice, puns are an important aspect of English-speaking culture, so I understand that and I’m ok with that. At least for me this “actually…” moment is always worth the scrolling effort :)

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s just the nature of a completely open and well known forum, I am okay with that. If I want a more edifying conversation, I would look elsewhere anyway.

            The complete openness to thought both beautiful and disgusting is what provides value to reddit, and will eventually provide value to Lemmy. It will be even better on Lemmy because instances that are aligned or adjacent can remain “friends” or federated so the users van easily maintain their echo chambers and create accounts to explore outside of them.

      • I am an expert on the little bugs that live on your skin. Swimming for extended periods not only doesn’t harm them, it makes them stronger. Try to limit swimming to 2 hours or less or they may become strong enough to take over control of your body!

        • Mothra@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s super interesting- would you have some sources or at least some keywords I could search for more info on how this happens?

          • Evoke3626@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Guess now’s an appropriate time o post this…

            Do you have a source on that? Source? A source. I need a source. Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion. No, you can’t make inferences and observations from the sources you’ve gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you’ve gathered. You can’t make normative statements from empirical evidence. Do you have a degree in that field? A college degree? In that field? Then your arguments are invalid. No, it doesn’t matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION. You still haven’t provided me a valid source yet. Nope, still haven’t. I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I’m debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

    • WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You will still find these on Quora. They don’t even need to say what they are, their subtitle will just say it all

  • InDogYearsImDead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    1 year ago

    As another user pointed out, most bacteria and other microscopic forms of life don’t really “breath” in the way we think of it. Often they just absorb oxygen from their surrounding environments.

    They can be washed away, killed by chlorine (pools), or killed by salt imbalance (ocean). However it’s really hard (read near impossible) to kill them all, and even if you did they exist in our environments naturally and from other humans as well as on things we’ve touched recently. So they repopulate quickly.

    There are some arguments that Sodium Laurel Sulfate kills “good” bacteria on our skin.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Shower, probably. Part of the function of soap (and scrubbing) is to dislodge dirt and bacteria, so it gets washed away.

        So you’re either committing genocide by killing them outright, or forcefully relocating them from your body. (also why 99% soap generally doesn’t matter too much compared to regular soap)

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Doesn’t the nature of subsurfacants rip apart most bacteria? That’s what I have always been taught, but my mother supplemented a lot of my education and I have learned she hasn’t always been 100% right… although neither were my textbooks l… so I guess flaws all around

    • sosodev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Showering does kill mites and bacteria that are all over your body. They’re quite resilient though so you’re never really rid of them.

  • dodgy_bagel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now hear me out:

    What if you jumped through a tall fire, naked, a few times? Nothing so fast as to actually burn you, but enough to make you hairless.

    I’m fairly certain that would kill quite a bit of the microbiome.

  • snailwizard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am not a microbiologist. However I do know that bacteria are pretty resilient, and most pathogens and parasites can live for at least a few hours outside of a host. Plus your skin is really not all that smooth at a microscopic level, there are all sorts of little nooks and crannies to hold onto.

    Drowning wouldn’t really be a concern for them, imo, but additives like chlorine are specifically meant to be disinfectants.

  • stevestevesteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would expect the chlorine in a swimming pool or the salt content on the ocean to be a bigger problem for the microscopic life on our bodies.

  • AndromedusGalacticus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here’s what Chatgpt/google bard have to say:

    The answer is: not necessarily. Most of the bacteria on our skin are adapted to living in wet environments, so they will not suffocate. However, some bacteria may be washed away or killed by the chlorine in the pool.

    • CineMaddie@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why are we relying on language models to answer questions. These things don’t really “know” anything right?

      • NightFantom@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        They don’t, but they sound as convincing, (and are probably as correct) as a random blog you’d find googling your question

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        They don’t, and people are way too blasé about how “oh it’s actually the same as googling because it’s just taking from sources online anyway,” when in reality it does nothing to “keep” the knowledge it gets from those sites and is just stringing together words that often go together. It’s like thinking your phone’s predictive text can answer your questions, if your phone also invented quotes and sources (this has already been an issue with journalists and lawyers using ChatGPT to “research”).

        • CineMaddie@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thank god someone who understands. I hated how towards the end reddit was so full of misinformation and people talking out of their ass with confidence. Hope Lemmy can steer away from those tendencies. It’s okay if we don’t have the answer sometimes.

      • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        No one knows anything get over yourself buddy - it gave a correct answer way more polite than I ever could so who’s gonna complain

      • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t they pull from online sources? So it’s basically googling with extra steps and an unpredictable middleman

        • CineMaddie@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That would be right if they understood/knew what they were talking about. It’s more akin to really advanced autocorrect that sounds/reads like something the ai was trained on. So it sounds correct but really has 0 basis on truth other than “the model predicts a human would say X next”. Truth is rarely the goal of any of these machine learning language models afaik.

      • AndromedusGalacticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I’m aware. There were like 10 comments with no replies, so I thought it’d be fun to see what the Chatbot would say. I didn’t take its answer too seriously, but I knew people might be sensitive to the answer. It would have been unfair of me to not say that it was though. Now people can at least decide whether or not to discard the information by providing a “source”.