California clean energy industry rocked with widespread jobs losses, bankruptcies, following state’s dismantling of rooftop solar program::undefined

  • @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    607 months ago

    Frankly, it’d be far better for the state, its finances, its residents, its energy infrastructure, and fire prevention across the state if they dismantled PG&E instead of this rooftop solar program.

    • @phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Well - they kinda needed the grid for this program. Basically, the incentive was you could install solar and send your excess power to the grid. Whatever you put on the grid, you could take back 1:1 when you needed it (ie. at night). Essentially, you could treat the grid as your battery, without needing to pay for a battery. This made the break even time horizon super short.

      It also meant solar customers weren’t paying much for grid infrastructure and transmission costs.

      Now, you can only draw back 25% of what you send to the grid. Getting a battery now makes more sense, but it’s also a big upfront cost.

      Don’t get me wrong. PGE is evil incarnate and its execs should be sent to prison. The company should be seized by the public. Rates should be lowered on the backs of executive bonuses and salaries.

      But, as a non-solar owner, I do think the previous deal was only going to increase costs for non-solar customers. It couldn’t last forever. Hopefully, the state does improve the current incentives just a bit though. More than anything though, the state needs to take control of PGE and fire the execs.

      • @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        I’m talking about a permanent and irrevocable state takeover of the company. I grew up in California, and still have family there. PG&E has demonstrated that they are wildly inept - perhaps criminally so - for basically my entire life. They do not deserve to be a company.

  • @Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    457 months ago

    "SAN FRANCISCO – California’s once-thriving residential solar industry is in ruins after state officials slashed rooftop solar incentives, causing thousands of job losses, said clean energy advocates and solar industry representatives during a recent virtual briefing.

    The incentives played a crucial role in outfitting solar panels on approximately 2 million homes, establishing the state as the leader in the clean energy revolution. But the California Public Utilities Commission, or CPUC, bowed to demands from Pacific Gas & Electric, Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric to roll back those incentives."

    Of course the gas/electric company hates it.

  • Otter
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Not from California, what happened? Why was the program implemented and then scrapped?

    • @Pretzilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      177 months ago

      The CPUC board, appointed by governer Newsom, gets to set the rules.

      The utilities including PGE and So Cal Edison apparently own said governer.

    • @pacology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 months ago

      They decided to pay wholesale prices for electricity sold back to the grid instead of residential prices. That means that any excess power sold goes from around 33 cents to 6 cents, meaning that most people won’t see a change in their bills after installing solar because most households use power at night when there is no sun. This leads to people just not installing solar panels anymore.

  • @ironsoap
    link
    English
    167 months ago

    Looks like industry got what they wanted.

      • @shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        87 months ago

        We’re not going to win hearts and minds unless we can show personally impactful results. Solar is an excellent way to do that.

        Me for example; At this point I’d have to pay more for solar on my home. That’s kinda hard to swallow unless you’re well off.

        I should note; Got a tiny house and it’s very efficient. I suspect most homeowners would be better off on solar.

        • @GiddyGap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          67 months ago

          So, what you’re saying is that people are selfish douchebags who care only about their own pocketbook? Sounds about right.

          • FraidyBear
            link
            fedilink
            English
            47 months ago

            I’d love nothing more than to have solar panels and a home battery to help save the planet but I can’t even afford my rent. How the fuck àm I supposed to buy a home and also I stall solar. Most Americans are living paycheck to paycheck. I don’t think that it’s self centered thinking that’s the problem, personally.

            • @GiddyGap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              17 months ago

              We all need to do what we can, even when it’s just little things like buying less plastic or considering sustainable groceries.

              Right now, the US is one of the bigger culprits in the world, and a great place to start is to vote for people who actually want to do something for our planet.

        • @brlemworld@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Even if thousands of us get together and get solar, it will be offset because Bezos bought another mega yacht. They need to be regulated out of existence.

  • Alex
    link
    fedilink
    English
    67 months ago

    Not California, too! What happened with them being based?

    • @proudblond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      127 months ago

      Apparently PG&E, a company with literal blood on its hands, has us and our lawmakers by the balls. Fuck them for San Bruno, for Paradise, and for my energy bill.

  • @mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17 months ago

    Honestly, this was a pretty stupid policy in the first place. The maintenance and upkeep for all the houses is way more than just putting solar in the field somewhere. It was a policy that sounded good on paper, but did not actually work in practice. A much better policy would be a community owned solar power facility. The solar panels we have today will be obsolete in five years time if not sooner, a dedicated solar facility would be able to update panels overtime and handle the maintenance at scale. Much easier than trying to upgrade or maintain solar panels on top of a bunch of peoples houses.