The bottom of the article links to the history (individual features) of other IM programs from that era as well like ICQ and Yahoo Messenger.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 month ago

      Which Microsoft then shit all over (to be fair, Skype started that process even before MS bought them) and eventually renamed it to Microsoft Teams.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        1 month ago

        And for a while, there was also Skype for Business (formerly Lync (formerly Communicator)).

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah that was part of the brand reshuffling they did to obfuscate things. Lync was their shitty chat app they tried to convince businesses to use that everyone hated. They bought Skype, renamed it to Microsoft Teams, renamed Lync to Skype for Business, and killed MSN Messenger. When people still didn’t want to use LyncSkype for Business, then they killed that as well, and now it’s just MS Teams.

          • caoimhinr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 month ago

            Fun fact any developer working with the api can tell you, there is a clear distinction between de voip bit and the meeting/chat bit. They haven’t bothered rewriting or integrating it in any way so the Skype for business backend is still very much alive.

            • GreyBeard
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              1 month ago

              Another fun fact: On the backend, Teams uses SharePoint to store files, and Exchange to store message. The whole M365 stack is a house of cards built on ancient tech. It’s a wonder it works at all.

          • ShunkW@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 month ago

            Lync was such garbage. I used that for years at one of my old jobs. Teams just feels like discord with extra shittiness lol.

            The worst part is that they had developed an in-house app that worked amazing but abandoned it for teams.

        • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          Still remember setting up lync 2013 for our company. It was one of the funner projects I remember doing. I was not as thrilled about setting up SharePoint 2013…

      • yamanii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Skype was never meant to replace MSN, even back then everyone complained about it and we talked on teamspeak while playing games.

  • Uninvited Guest@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m surprised no one mentioned Facebook.

    I recall using MSN as far as in to 2009, but the friends I was connected with migrated to Facebook when their chat feature rolled out.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      I recall using MSN as far as in to 2009, but the friends I was connected with migrated to Facebook when their chat feature rolled out.

      another reason to hate facebook

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Same, it was pretty much an instant change too. Which sucked as Facebook chat was very unreliable at the time and obviously not very feature rich.

    • kevindqc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      The article touches on that

      The advent of social media and mobile devices couldn’t be ignored either. These technologies were enabling new ways for people to stay in touch with friends and family that didn’t involve a traditional computer.

    • m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      From my ignorant point of view Microsoft had in its very own hands a solid competitor to Facebook but ended doing absolutely nothing with it.

      I still can recall the MSN/Hotmail profiles - it was kind of a news feed that recorded all your statuses from MSN (or you could add your own there). Your contacts could add comments on those. I seem to recall at some point you could add posts with pictures too.

      But all of that just disappeared when they ditched MSN.

      They could’ve beat Facebook in its own game easily, as they had the advantage of their huge userbase - but somehow they missed on that too.

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 month ago

    Anyone remember the short-lived Great War of the Messenger Apps? For a few months back around… '98? '99? MSN tried really hard to shoehorn its way into working with AIM. About every day there would be an update from MSM Messenger to allow it to work with AIM. Then AOL would fuck with their own protocol to ice out MSN users again.

    I think these shenanigans also impacted the Trillium Messenger app too, which up until then had been flying under the radar of messenger interoperability.

    I might be getting some of these details wrong.

    • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      And then Jabber came to fix it by introducing an open protocol, and Google started supporting it, and all was well. But when everybody was using Google Chat they severed the Jabber compatibility, locking everyone in to their platform. Now we’re back wading around in enshittified shit and Jabber is dead.

      • TarantulaFudge@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        Support matrix!! It already has international support, just needs to be a bit better with stickers and qol stuff. I’ve been using it for years. It’s nice to know I don’t have to worry about my privacy at all with chat rooms that can continue on without the original server.

        • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          It was promoted to me as a contender for Slack / IRC, not for the kind of direct messaging app that ICQ / MSN messenger was.

      • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        I wouldn’t say jabber is dead, xmpp is still pretty well used. Not enough IMO, but still in use and with readily available modern servers. Jitsi is xmpp+jingle (sip signalling) after all.

      • Kushan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        People blame Google for the death of jabber because of one blog post from a disgruntled contributor but the truth is jabber was never popular and Google chat died as well.

        Jabber was a mess, most of the clients were barely compatible with Each other and it was a wild west of feature support. Some clients were well featured with the ability to send richer messages, but typically only worked with a specific server and the same clients. Jabber did a crap job at making sure clients and servers interacted properly with each other and didn’t push the standards quickly enough, forcing clients to do their own thing.

        Which is all Google did, they went their own way because nobody used jabber and the interoperability was causing more harm than good. It didn’t work, Google talk died and many years later clients like WhatsApp took over instead.

        • sibachian@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          facebook, google talk, etc. all relied on the XMPP protocol. you could add your facebook messenger friends to google talk or any of the open source clients like pidgin. it was the holy era of instant messaging. federated. solution. no bullshit lockdown to a specific system like in the days of ICQ, Skype, etc.

          then both facebook and google talk locked down their XMPP server and i lost 80% of my friendlist on XMPP. and that was that. i had to get facebook. i had to get google mail. especially relevant when microsoft bought skype and it turned to shit.

          guess what. today we’re split on even more clients than we used to be. need signal, whatsapp, facebook messenger, telegram, discord, band, matrix, threema, session, irc, slack, and steam chat installed on my fucking device. and all because meta and google pulled the rug to isolate their systems and force user conversion.

          no, thanks. open source federation is the only solution to unshitification and that’s never going to happen as long as people do shit like leaving x for bluesky instead of mastodon etc. leaving facebook for band instead of literally any other fediverse platform (because facebook has devolved to ads and facebook groups - everything else is irrelevant or dead on there). etc etc.

    • ShunkW@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      I used that until they pay walled it. Then I found Pidgen I believe it was called. It was open source and could connect to pretty much every messenger and IRC and stuff. Then my friend just switched to texting lol

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        Pidgin. Before that it was called Gaim.
        It still works, as there are plugins to integrate it with almost everything.

        • ShunkW@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I knew it wasn’t spelled exactly like the bird lol. But yeah I used that shit for years. I don’t really have a use for it anymore or I’d probably still be using it

          • WildPalmTree@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            “A pidgin /ˈpɪdʒɪn/, or pidgin language, is a grammatically simplified means of communication that develops between two or more groups of people that do not have a language in common: typically, its vocabulary and grammar are limited and often drawn from several languages.”

          • toynbee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I used it all the way up until Google broke compatibility with it, then continued using it with a third party plug-in until that stopped being maintained.

            Now I prefer Signal over Chat.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Trillian was definitely part of that war. I remember the daily patches to get things working again.

    • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think the article mentions it. AOL tried to block it and this to and fro went 21 times before finally coming to a stop. MSN and Yahoo later signed a deal, I think, so that the former will work with latter’s contacts properly.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 month ago

    I might have been 10 minutes too young for ICQ. I think that’s what the college kids were playing with when I was in high school. For my cohort it was the big three: MSN, Yahoo! and AIM. You probably had all three installed on your computer and probably all running at once. They’re probably why my entire generation can touch type. Vital tool for teenage social life at the turn of the century.

    This was Microsoft’s era, too. The main reason Apple survived the 90’s was because Microsoft invested in them to counter anti-trust allegations. They paid Apple to keep existing so they couldn’t be called a monopoly. Internet Explorer was the web browser, any others in use were a rounding error. No one had a Mac, a few people were still clinging to their Amigas. THE platform for personal/home computing and internet access was a Pentium PC with Windows ME or XP, which came with MSN Messenger out of the box.

    Two things happened nearly simultaneously: Facebook Messenger and the iPhone. Graduating high school in 2005, your freshman year of college you probably started hearing about the cool new site that’s kinda like MySpace except it’s only for college kids. By your junior year all your new college friends were on Facebook and all your old high school friends that never logged on let alone talk to you were on MSN. And if you graduated in 2005, your junior year was in 2007, the year the iPhone was launched. MSN Messenger had been present as baked in “functions” of certain media phones at the time, but I don’t think they ever made it to the App Store or even the Play Store on Android. Facebook was fast to adopt mobile apps, and for awhile there it was the one messenger service that interoperated between desktop on a web browser and smart phones across platforms. SMS didn’t run on the desktop, iMessage is Apple-only, AIM, MSN and Yahoo were nowhere to be found and Telegram, Signal, Discord etc. weren’t around yet. So everyone standardized on Facebook Messenger.

    Meanwhile, Microsoft bought and ruined Skype.

    • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think that’s what the college kids were playing with when I was in high school.

      Started college in 1995, and I indeed did have ICQ before too long. Still remember my number (6725571).

      You probably had all three installed on your computer and probably all running at once.

      I remember using a program called Trillian (which is still around!) in the late 90s/early 00s. It allowed you to connect multiple IM accounts in one app. It was sorta finicky, but it got the job done.

    • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      As a diehard Netscape Navigator user, I scoff at your browser choice.

      The running joke in my day was everyone used Internet Explorer… to download Netscape.

          • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean, you name dropped Netscape. Your next of kin is probably rehearsing the talk where they take your car keys away as we speak.

            The topic of discussion is MSN Messenger, its popularity and demise, which puts us in the period between 1999 and ~2008. Especially during the first half of that decade, practically everyone was using IE. And not really liking it, but using it nevertheless.

    • Soapbox1858@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      You nailed my experience. Though AIM was preferred. I begrudgingly used MSN too for a couple people who weren’t allowed to install AIM.

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      It was awesome. Especially paired with the msn messenger plus mod.

      Near the end of its time and also when WiFi was taking off, I had friends with everyone in a uni house, but their WiFi was quite unreliable, so every hour or so I’d get 6 “person is online” pop up toasts appear simultaneously, stacked up on top of each other.

  • moonbunny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    Microsoft Teams is sorta like the all grown up version of MSN, with the colour drained from it and “fun” features out of the box feeling dead on the inside

  • Crunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    well, the same as the others really: Time.

    I think once SMS and phone apps became the norm over having Messenger apps on our Desktops all the time, that was pretty much it for these applications over all. It was a long, slow death. But MSN was one of the firsts to call it quits if I recall right. Oddly the IM app I liked the most. It’s just not many of my friends used it. They were all AIM/AOL users.

    • fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The one thing these messengers had over texts was presence notifications. I remember jumping through hoops to get aim working on my Motorola v188 so that I could be notified every time my crush came online and I could send her a “hey what’s going on”… only for it to be ignored.

    • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      I miss Adium, I used it for a bunch of protocols, and I customized the CSS/html to make it look really awesome.

      I had an app called snakeskin or something to skin my Mac OS X to be dark themed.

          • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            With Linux and other FOSS projects surging in popularity, I dare say we’re in for another.

            But, sadly, companies don’t seem too interested in making good software for that sake of it being good anymore. Now it’s all about getting you hooked on an eternal subscription.

            • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              I certainly hope so. It’s been great seeing PopOS and Linux Mint pushing the bar on what a good linux desktop experience can be.

              I’d love to see Linux become a stronger competitor to macos (which is what I’ve used for almost 20 years).

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    It was very popular within my friends up until the skype merger. At that point they went “i aint usin skype lmao”

  • Orbital@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    I never knew anybody who used it. I had one contact on ICQ. Everybody else used AIM.

    • infeeeee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 month ago

      I was in highschool in the 2000s in Europe, and msn was our default way of communication with classmates.

      • MurrayL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yep, early 2000s in the UK and everyone was using MSN. I didn’t know a single person using AIM or ICQ!

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          I can see why AIM would be mostly an American phenomenon, given it was initially a feature specific to AOL. ICQ…I like to say I’m 10 minutes too young to have used ICQ, everybody who has wistful memories of it were like the seniors when I was a freshman. Yahoo! was the other one; the perpetual alsoran.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 month ago

        remember trillian? or pidgin was it called? you could message every service.

        that was badass.

        • Orbituary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Both. Trillian was not Mac only (I made a mistake from memory), Pidgin was multi platform but started on Linux. Pidgin had every protocol. I still keep my .purple config folder and logs after over a decade. Not like I’ll ever read the logs again, though.

          Edit: Guys, relax. I made a mistake recounting from memory. I didn’t run Windows back then. I assumed that because of the native Aqua interface, there wasn’t a Windows port.

          • i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            I remember having Trillian on Windows way back when.

            I’ll have you know I did go back and read my logs from like 2008. I think I cringed so hard I never recovered. You might have saved yourself by not looking at yours!

          • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Trillian was not Mac only. I’ve never owned a Mac and used Trillian almost exclusively from 2002 until roughly 2009?? I can’t remember when the transition from IM to texting happened for me, but it was around then. When I was running Linux at home I would use Gaim, which was developed by a friend of the main Trillian guy.

        • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I actually forgot all about that, but yes I did use Trillian at one point. Can you imagine big tech companies letting you use third party apps that didn’t lock you into their service or ad stream these days?

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think this is another one of those cases where the US does something different to the rest of the world: the majority of people were using msn messenger but the US was using aim.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        AIM was released in 1997, MSN in 1999. AIM was at the time the biggest ISP in the United States, so AIM was pretty uniquely marketed to us.

        It was my observation that you had two main camps: Those whose home was AIM, and those whose home was MSN. And the deciding factor was probably if you used AOL as your ISP. There were people who didn’t know you could get an AIM account if you weren’t an AOL customer. Those who didn’t use AOL probably went the same way others did around the world, MSN messenger was built into Windows so it was the obvious one to use.

    • yamanii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t even know what AIM is, everyone in Brazil was on ICQ and MSN, if you were a kid or teen you were on MSN, if you were an adult you were on ICQ.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ah, sorry. Us peons aren’t used to being in the presence of master intellects such as yours. Truly, we are not worthy of your attention, o wise one.

        How silly of us to talk about MSN on a submission about MSN.

    • kitnaht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      MSN = Microsoft Network. They didn’t “happen”…they were always part of the process. MSN messenger was never anything other than a Microsoft product.

      • parpol@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        The reason MSN stopped being used was because Microsoft started requiring Microsoft accounts for it to work, and started pushing people towards Skype. Which is why “Microsoft happened”. I never really meant to imply that Microsoft bought it or anything, just that they are the reason it eventually died.

        • yamanii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          I thought it always required a microsoft e-mail? It’s why most millenials had a hotmail before gmail was a thing.

          • parpol@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah, but those Hotmail accounts were lightweight and simple. They weren’t connected to a Microsoft metaverse of spyware like they are now. I had 3 of these Hotmail accounts but at some point I got locked out of all of them for not providing Microsoft with my phone number. That’s how I personally stopped using MSN.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      give me back messenger. at least it was a cohesive usable app.

      teams is just a low budget email emulation machine that still fails to deliver a functioning inbox, much like outlook.

      I’d rather drag my dick through HIV riddled discord memes then use that rotting pile of shit called teams.