• brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Lol I have several guns. Some I don’t know if I even have ammo for them at all.

    I can’t imagine the mindset these types of owners have. They are afraid and they want to murder someone. I can’t imagine

    Hell, the few rifles I have are stored with the firing bolts removed and locked up separately.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      If I had to kill somebody, I’d be scarred for life. Even if it was clearly in self defense.

      Yet I’ve talked to gun owners who fantasize about getting the drop on a burglar and shooting them dead or something like that. I don’t know if they’re actually that bloodthirsty or just delusional, but either way it’s pretty disturbing.

      • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        36 minutes ago

        I think it’s the marketing. Everything has to me monetized or giggified and it’s hard for us to just do stuff for no good reason (like collect and/or shoot guns). We’ve got to justify by protecting ou family from the zombie apocalypse or crime waves or something.

        I think a lot of it is whistling in the dark as well. Our powerlessness coupled with hyper individualism and lack of social support makes for some pretty uncomfortable truths.

        Plus the grab bag of racism and misdirected class fear.

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        37 minutes ago

        Oh same. I’ve talked with friends about conceal carry. We all agree it would be the scariest thing possible to actually need to use it. We’ll pretty much want to exhaust all other options including running the fuck away first.

        We couldn’t imagine the idea of actually living with having murdered someone. I know I’d pretty much immediately end up in therapy to help process it.

      • Crikeste@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        39 minutes ago

        It’s both.

        Our systems have taught them that criminals are worthless disgusting inhuman animals who deserve death, and they’ve never considered the trauma associated with killing someone.

        Plenty of veterans lives are ruined by shit like that, and they signed up for it. A little basement dwelling incel couldn’t even comprehend the trauma.

        And let’s not forget the statistics of the people who break into your house. It’s likely someone you know. Are you prepared to shoot your friend?

    • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This case is horrible, but you have misrepresented it in your comments. The teens broke a window and entered his house with the intention to rob it—it was not left wide open. The recording devices were turned on because he knew they were robbing the house. His first shots to stop the intruders were legal.

      Where the crime occurred is that the original shots did not kill them, and then he executed them after they were downed. He also did not report the bodies for a day.

      Don’t get me wrong, dude is a psychopathic asshole, but misrepresenting the series of events doesn’t help anybody.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 hours ago

        They weren’t, they went over this in the trial.

        He became the aggressor when he removed barriers to entry and laid in wait which is a negative defense for self defense.

        • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Wikipedia says they broke a window to enter, and that can be heard on audio—I’m not trying to argue with everything, but how is a closed window that had to be broken for entry not a barrier?

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            They did, read the testimony. He has the window blocked and he removed it so the window would be the easiest way to enter.

            He set a trap, there’s no legitimate purpose for that.

            • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 hour ago

              The dude clearly murdered them and had violent vigilante fantasies—I don’t argue that one bit.

              That said, they still came up to his house, broke a window, and entered with the intention to burgle it. It doesn’t really matter if the window was previously blocked or made of paper—breaking and entering with the intention of burglary is a crime, and having no block on a window isn’t enticement to have your house burgled.

              Again, before anyone thinks I’m defending him, I fully agree that he is a murderer. I just think the burglars weren’t innocent either. In Reddit lingo, “everyone sucks here”.

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                50 minutes ago

                You are defending him boss.

                The jury took less than three hours to establish as a matter of fact that none of the shootings were justified or in defense. It’s a fact now, your opinion is just that… An opinion and one not backed by either statute or the court case.

      • MonkeyDatabase@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        With the premise the OP presented, I expected something worse than what was actually there. It was still horrible, but the impact was lessened for the reasons you listed.

        Interesting how someone can manufacture consent like that by shifting your initial view.

      • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s been a long time since I’ve heard about this case, but my recollection was that he left his garage door open and parked away from his house so it would appear open and unoccupied. I didn’t see anything on the Wikipedia page that refutes that.

        • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Smith had been visiting neighbors when he saw Kifer, whom he suspected was responsible for the burglaries, driving past his home. He commented that he needed to get ready for her and went back to his home. Upon entering his home, Smith turned on a recording device he owned. He removed the light bulbs from the ceiling lights and positioned himself in a chair that was obscured from view. He heard the window upstairs break and Brady climb in (captured on audio).

          There may have been a window from the garage to the house or something, but it clearly says they broke a window, entered his home, and proceeded to the basement where they were shot. He had previously been burgled in the garage too, which Wikipedia says he was unaware about until police found evidence of a prior burglary. The house had been burgled previously as well, which is why he was looking out for people casing his house.

          I hope none of this comes off as a defense of that asshole, but facts matter, and those teens did commit a crime. I don’t think they deserved to be executed for it, but he was within his rights to defend himself when they broke in to his home. He was not within his rights to execute them after the threat was over.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            but he was within his rights to defend himself when they broke in to his home.

            No he wasn’t, read the actual case transcript.

            He was not within his rights to execute them after the threat was over.

            There was never a threat, you really really need to read the court transcripts.

    • rayyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This is the absolute truth. I personally know a guy who pulls out a huge roll of money just to buy a $1 pop from a machine at night. He carries, has been for years. He is trying to get someone to mug him. You know why.

    • Barsukis@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’m not in any way trying to defend what he did, but am I missing something? It’s written that the teens broke in with the intention to rob the house? Still a planned murder of course, but I think it’s important to mention it, they weren’t just good Samaritans checking in on a neighbour whose door was left open

        • Barsukis@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 minutes ago

          I agree, but it still felt like the comment wasn’t being genuine. Horrible things can be horrible without making them sound more horrible than they actually were

  • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Im someone who likes to shoot a gun at targets at the range. I find it SO creepy and unnerving when it becomes clear that someone would like to shoot at a person. They don’t usually outright say it, but some make it clear in other ways.

    • BrotherL0v3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Right? Like in my ideal world, guns would be a hobby for weird nerds in the same way fencing is today. The one or two times I have felt like there’s even a small chance I may need to use a gun in self defense were terrifying and stressful.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        There’s quite a few hobbies where the other people who meet up to participate as a group as a group are a huge turnoff.

        Guns are one of those hobbies for me.

        I would love to talk about the amazing mechanics and different approaches guns have to firing an exploding charge to move a mass of metal at supersonic speeds just like I love talking about the mechanical parts of trains and cars. But the gun crowd tends to have too high of a proportion of very vocal terrible people.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I would love to talk about the amazing mechanics and different approaches guns have to firing an exploding charge to move a mass of metal at supersonic speeds

          You need to hang out with gunsmiths. Those are the folks having those kinds of conversations.

        • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 hours ago

          If you like guns as a technology Open Source Defense is a good newsletter imo. They don’t delve into politics thankfully but look at how laws are implemented, improving safety at scale etc

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          42 minutes ago

          See if you can find yourself a group with operation blazing sword. Whatever you do, LGS usually have just FUDDs who want to talk how turnip daddy is going to make everything like it was back in the 50s again…most of the sane ass people who are into owning and shooting are online now (there are still a shit ton of magats but just avoid those places). It also helps if you can find a group that has a private range, it’ll make it a lot easier to setup times to go enjoy shooting.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        A couple years ago I joined a private shooting club. They have a range with targets from 10-300 yards. It was so cool to shoot there, and all the other members were total marksmanship nerds. Seeing all the great equipment, and ridiculous scopes was always fun, and the other members were nice to talk to. There were no soldier LARPers there. We operated as our own range masters, and everyone took safety very seriously. It was a refreshing change from the public range. Unfortunately I moved a couple hours away from that range, so it didn’t make sense to continue paying the membership anymore. Now I just go to the mountains to shoot.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Can’t find it now, but there was an image of a police target floating around that had the outline of a person holding up a cell phone camera.

      Dystopian AF.

  • Okokimup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Sounds like my former coworker showing off his new gun on Facebook a few years back, with the post “I can’t wait to use this to defend my family.”

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      As someone seriously considering their first firearm purchase, my main thought is “I hope this is a gigantic waste of time and money”.

      • redisdead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Well, good news, a firearm would achieve the exact opposite of protecting you and your loved one from harm.

        https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25910555/

        In fact it’s the opposite. A firearm is far more likely to be involved in an accidental injury or death of someone in the household than it is going to be used in any form of self defense.

        If you want to effectively protect yourself, invest in actual home security measures.

        So rest assured that any firearm you purchase for self defense is always going to be a huge waste of money.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          33 minutes ago

          No …no it doesn’t. These studies are stupid levels of flawed. Not all crimes are reported to the police where nothing happened. Most DGUs no shot is fired, but they don’t get counted because they’re not reported.

          The studies that try and show that a gun in the home is more dangerous use suicide statistics as well, which is like saying you’re more likely to drown in a pool if you own one…which the answer is “no shit”.

    • BioMyth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 hours ago

      People like to think that because they own a gun, if they ever got to use it they would be John Wick.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Also, it’s a movie, not real life. John wick would have died hundreds of times in those movies if even some of those events were real.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Man, I would be pretty upset if I dedicated a bunch of my time to compete, and then a guy who got paid millions of dollars to train with some of the best experts in the field showed up as a competitor. That would be like entering an amateur competition and there’s a fucking Navy Seal in line next to you.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          I think nearly everyone in the firearms community realizes how much time and effort Keanu puts into training.

          I think the opposite is more true; meaning that people OUTSIDE the firearms community have little to no idea how much time and effort it takes to be anything like what he looks like in the movies. Nor do they realize how far removed the movies they watch are from reality. Suppressors are not silent, shooting things 50 yards away with a pistol is almost always going to result in a miss, your ears are ringing after just one or two shots making conversations after a gun battle impossible, and so on.

    • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yes those people do

      And then there’s a ton of people that have guns, train when they can and hope they never have to use their skills outside of the range or competitions. We never ever hear about them because they are normal people

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The reality is that most of the imagined scenarios which cause a person to want a gun for self defense are rooted in some form of these same delusions. They really are just not as useful in as many situations as people think they are, and these people almost never take far simpler measures to deal with their real threat profile.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Honestly, I was thinking of this

      White Man & Black Man Carry AR-15 Rifles In Open Carry Video Experiment

      A recent video posted to YouTube by Willie Upchuck captures the same incident resulting in two distinctively different responses from police. A White gentleman is politely questioned by police, while a Black man is harshly told to get on the ground at gunpoint.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The black man that volunteered for that must have a death wish. He had to have gone into that thinking there was a very good chance the police would shoot him on sight.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I think the kids filming the experiment were as shocked by the results as anyone watching the video. Very possibly a camera being at the scene of the criminal misuse of police power arrest saved the black guy’s life.

  • BioMyth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Way too true, I know too many people who are genuinely like this my brother included. If people have this kind of mindset they shouldn’t be allowed to own guns, it is a tragedy waiting to happen.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      After not being able to find a job with a 401(k), and knowing that the incoming administration is gonna gut social security… Yup.

      • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Tons of jobs with joke-ass 401ks they wear in their sleeve that they don’t match or give any incentive whatsoever for, and hope you’ll forget about when you leave.

        When my company told us they didn’t match, I asked why bother, then found out $25 was mandatory. Hell.