• Carl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    4 days ago

    “He/him means male but also neutral” was a standard thing that was taught for a long time, and while it was true at one point it eventually got taken up by the “anti singular they/them nerds” and lost its credibility.

  • Chana [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 days ago

    “They” as a neutral pronoun predates using “he” for everything and has been considered more proper for a long time - except among losers.

  • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    4 days ago

    Sadly this was considered progressive in the 90s

    Keep in mind the idea that girls did anything other than talk about boys and makeup was laughed at by most people at the time, or at the least given an eye roll. “You just want attention from boys” was a sentiment that lasted well into the 2010s

    • BeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 days ago

      “You just want attention from boys” was a sentiment that lasted well into the 2010s

      To the point that libs were accusing women who supported Bernie Sanders of doing it “for the boys.”

  • TerminalEncounter [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 days ago

    I remember reading it in the 90s lol. You know it’s nice they said anything and addressed it at all. “He or she”, like some splat books in 3.5 was pretty clunky. Lately they’ve been mixing pronouns which is cool (like some sections use he, others use she, some use they), or exlusively using they/them which is probably the actually more gender-neutral term anyway.

    • tocopherol [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 days ago

      Skimming through the 5e book online now, to describe building your character they use the perspective of a fictional player ‘Bob’ and use he/him for that section, but generally uses non gendered language or “he or she”, as in “Class broadly describes a character’s vocation, what special talents he or she possesses…” I don’t get why ‘they’ isn’t the default in place of ‘he or she’.

      • keepcarrot [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        It is interesting the rather large number of people that think that Hasbro cops will break down your door and ban you from D&D if your group agrees to some other rules. The number of times I see the question “If my gaming group agrees to play by some rule, is that allowed in D&D?” (or whichever system) is… Well, it’s a lot

        • fox [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          On the other hand Hasbro is the only ttrpg publisher that’s actually sent Pinkertons to break down someone’s door, so the concern isn’t entirely unfounded

      • SpiderFarmer [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        THAC0, twenty different charts, attributes being split into two different categories, percentile rolls. I love the system on some level, but you can apply rule zero to anything to claim it’s simple.

        • RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, that’s why the OSR exists, I think. I have a copy of Old School Essentials, which is basically just a rewritten 2E, but one of the first things they did was convert THAC0 to the system 5E uses, for everything.

          • SpiderFarmer [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Hey, I love the system for what it is. I think it’s better for fine-tuning a character sheet than 3.5, plus some settings in that era had post-nuclear devastation and canonically bisexual elves.

            But I’m just calling it out on thinking grammar was the most mindracking thing.

  • Owl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    There were a lot of these notes in RPG books in the 90s. I remember also seeing alternating between he and she every paragraph (this sucked btw) and a convention where the players are he/him and the GM is she/her (sounds almost reasonable until they try to use it instead of specifying which player).

    • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      “she/he”, “he/she” and “(s)he” in academic texts where a thing for a while.

      Would have been so much cleaner to just read “they” or “them”.

    • CupcakeOfSpice [she/her, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think Ars Magica has a note where they basically say “We’ll throw around masculine and feminine pronouns and differently gendered nouns completely at random.” They use a lot of Latin, so there’s a lot of gendered nouns. Unfortunately they never seem to address genders or lack thereof outside the binary, but then again, neither does Latin.

  • iridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    If you want to be gender neutral, use they/them. If you insist this causes ambiguity once every fifty pages, use gender-neutral she/her. If you actually care about removal of (Very rare! You can usually reword your sentences!) ambiguity and gender neutrality, use two sets of neopronouns!