• BakerBagel@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 days ago

    Back when i had jobs that had 401k plans, all the calculators said i needed over $1 million to retire at age 70. Meanwhile i was living paycheck to paycheck trying to put something in there. How tf am i supposed to squirrel away 7 figures when i have mever made $40,000 in a year?

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Quit with the avocado toast and Starbucks. According to Sociopathic Oligarchs, that seems to have been a bigger factor in their wealth than their multi-generational inheritance.

      • Rooster326@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Having kids, and returning to multi-generational homes might be the only way one is retiring these days.

        Good luck on that one.

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          My 26 year old son is still living with us, and we are all totally fine with it. We’ve been an extremely close family all along, and I consider him my best friend, and I’m sure he would say the same thing.

          OTOH, I couldn’t wait to get out of my parents house. I could deal with it over summer breaks, but as soon as I moved back in after college, it was clear they still considered me a high schooler, and imposed a 10 pm curfew during the week, and an 11pm curfew on the weekends (so understanding). I didn’t say No to that, I just ignored it, like any adult would. Imposing a curfew? Please.

          Then they called me one Sunday morning and woke me up at my girlfriend’s place, and demanded I return home and explain myself (“What do you want me to say? I got laid, like an actual grown adult, which I am”).

          Got with a buddy, pooled our minimum wages, and got an apartment together. Back then, rent was $300, so it was possible. Even with a friend, I doubt my son could get the money together to get an apartment today. His student loans are going to eat too much of his income for a significant portion of his life. He certainly couldn’t do it on minimum wage.

          He’s welcome to stay as long as he wants.

        • AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          My wife and I have no kids and live with family and we’re still dubious on retiring 😹😿

          (granted part of this is due to losing all our money*2 during covid when some local businesses shuttered)

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      How tf am i supposed to squirrel away 7 figures when i have mever made $40,000 in a year?

      Compound investment is supposed to do a lot of the heavy lifting. At a 7% rate of return, your money doubles every 10 years. So, assuming you set aside $6k of that $40k/year ($500/mo), starting at age 22, you’d have $1M at age 60 and $2.2M at age 70

      https://www.bankrate.com/banking/savings/save-a-million-calculator/

      But here’s the trick… You’re looking down the barrel of 40 years of inflation. So, if you’re earning $40k in year one (let’s say, the year 2000) and you’ve been on the job for 25 years without getting a raise, inflation has reduced the real value of that income by roughly one half.

      On the flip side, let’s assume you’re keeping up with inflation (and that $500 you’re setting aside is increasing at the same rate). Then the math gets more complicated and I can’t help you anymore. But the point is you get to $1M sooner, simply because $1M in 2060 is worth a lot less than $1M in 2000.

      Had a broker explain that - at my current rate of savings - I’d be looking at a $4M retirement account by age 62. But then he dumped some ice water over my head when he noted “That’s only going to be worth around $1.1M in modern dollars by then”. Suggested I actually up my savings, because $1M only really feels like a lot until you try to live on it for the rest of your life.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        That’s why we need to have a conversation about taxing millionaires when everyone yells “tax the rich!”

        A million may be more than what a lot of people have, but it’s probably not even a number people can even retire with considering taxes and inflation. Two to 3 million might be a start, 4 million would be ok today, but when people retire in 10, 20, 30+ years from now? Who knows what that will be worth. And before someone quotes some return on 3-4 million with some high rate and says it’s a lot of money… Isn’t that what you want!? Out of all that you’re paying for health care, maybe a mortgage (because who stays one place long enough to pay it off these days?) or rent that you have to pay? Maybe help you with your kid’s crazy college costs? Sit around the house and wait to die now that you’re retired? People might say they could live on less, but doing things is expensive. House maintenance is expensive. Medical is expensive. It’s all getting more expensive.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          People might say they could live on less, but doing things is expensive.

          Doing things is expensive because people with million dollar a year incomes make it expensive. That’s where the million/year comes from.

          • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Where did I say anyone is making a million a year? What does a million a year have to do with a lifetime of saving, ROI, and compound interest for a normal person? If you’re making a mil a year retirement shouldn’t be a problem. Or are you just saying people should take up knitting in your version of retirement and constantly worry about money or a surprise expenditure?

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Or are you just saying people should take up knitting

              Man, don’t even get me started on the fast fashion industry. We’re killing the planet so that we can turn raw cotton into landfill waste on the backs of East Asian slave labor.

              If we could end that by telling Jeff Bezos and Chip Wilson to take up knitting? Yes, absolutely.

              Save the planet. Shut down Temu and lock Colin Huang in an oubliete until he darns everyone else a decent sweater.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  I have no idea why you jumped to it from millionaires needing to be taxed more.

                  But if you think knitting as a profession is some kind of joke, why would you defend people from taxation when they were profiteering off the textile work of others?

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        I am lucky if i have $300 in my bank account after all my expenses each month, and i live in a cheap town working a 9-5 job. I have no health insurance and have had to cash out multiple 401k’s to cover emergency expenses in the past 4 years. Saving for the future is an absolute joke since i can’t even afford to live today.

  • supercargo@r.nf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Make sure you put some money aside for the future.

    The money:

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      And windshields/screens.

      As well as tires, lubricants, tools, etc I guess. People tearing around the desert in vehicles with flawless glass is maybe the most unrealistic part of that image for me.

    • Rooster326@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Gasoline is only good for about a year before it starts to degrad even with fuel aditivies. You use non-ethanol gas but you’re maybe at absolute best getting 3 years out of it before it will begin to gum up your engine, disintegrate your fuel lines, etcetera.

      The Mad Max future is not going to last long

  • doleo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    People are still car dependent in that future? Fuck it, I’m out.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s not boomers vs. millenials, it’s billionaires vs. commoners/workers/have-nots. Don’t let them divide-and-conquer you.

      • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s that Boomers have participated in, and been behind the wheel, of most of the stupid, enabling moments of the 20th century. They built this world and got pissed when inequality they built to lock up money for themselves wasn’t sustainable.

        Then they blame everyone else because they have no self-reflection due to lead levels in their blood causing cognitive impairment and aggressive behavior. My favorite was a meme all over facebook saying “Back in my day we didn’t have plastic soda bottles…” Yeah, who TF changed it, genius? YOU ALL. Sure wasn’t me running all that stuff when I was 6 years old.

        • Rothe@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Again, you are conflating age for wealth. Lots of boomers did no such thing, and were as poor and powerless as you are. The powers that be got you good with the generational strife propaganda, so you don’t focus on the actual class war problem.

          • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Not at all. Owning a home and a car didn’t used to equate “wealth” in the 60’s. But the middle class and lower middle class certainly perpetuated things like Red Lining and segregating communities. Sure, they got fucked by the Vietnam war, but they also got a Constitutional Amendment to vote starting at age 18 in 1971 and elected fucking Nixon in 1972! Boomers were the fuel for the socio-economic disaster of the 1980s.They invented “greed is good.” They gave up on the dreams of the Hippie movement and sold out.

          • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Most of Boomers did said such thing. How tf you think Trump got in power, magic? You ever check out what Facebook looks like? You are confused as the people you are screeching about.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sure wasn’t me running all that stuff when I was 6 years old.

          Yeah we didn’t go to the trophy companies at 6 years old and demand they start making participation trophies, Deborah. Our generation didn’t start that shit.

      • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Boomers have supported, and voted for the status quo and these billionaires for decades upon decades at this point. And are still supporting the dictator Trump.

        So yeah your take is bullshit. George Carlin had it right, sorry not sorry.

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          90% of my millennial friends have been voting for the status quo for decades too. We’ll see how progressive they are once they’re the most conservative ones in the room, and they aren’t oh so painfully forced to vote for the status quo.

          Clarification: I’m saying that they’re currently being dishonest about supporting progressive values, not that they’ll change.

          • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            You know how much I heard this myth? Yall still parroting the same bullshit that you get more conservative as you get older, what a fucking joke.

          • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            This oversimplified dichotomy is asinine. No group of people are some monolithic Borg mind. These types of tribalism are toxic useless. Russians would call it convenient idiots. It is tribalistic dogma revealing poor fundamental logic skills typical for a culture derived from the inbred Puritan penal colony European rejects.

            • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s because America uses “first past the post” voting. Look it up. If you immediately realize that no honest intelligent person would support that, you’d be right.

          • arrow74@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            We’ll see how progressive they are once they’re the most conservative ones in the room

            Ah yes the popular myth of becoming more conservative as you get older. It used to be true because you would get a job, have a family, and retire. Suddenly your biggest concern became lower taxes so you could spend that money elsewhere. Rest of the country be damned.

            Except now significantly less people are doing those things because they have a lot less money than their parents did.

            All growing old has done is made me way more left. I can see and understand so much more about how the world is fucked up.

            • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Me too. I’m saying that they’re currently being dishonest about supporting progressive values, not that they’ll change.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Younger generations aren’t much better. Look at the age distribution of Trump voters: https://navigatorresearch.org/2024-post-election-survey-gender-and-age-analysis-of-2024-election-results/ (IDK if this is a good source, feel free to provide one that contradicts it if you find one. But it’s consistent with pretty much every poll I’ve seen on this topic, even in other western countries). The gender split is a lot more pronounced than any generational split.

          • Feydaikin@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            My friend, there is no political side on earth that isn’t guilty when it comes to the sad state the globe is in.

            And very few individuals that haven’t indulged in the sin of convenience that keeps the spiral going downward.

            • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Feydaikin with the “both sides” take

              IMO, there are political parties that aren’t perfect and political parties that are speedrunning complete annihilation of the biosphere and human rights.

              • Feydaikin@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                24 hours ago

                Yup, when it comes to fucking over the environment, pointing fingers only shows your own lack of accountability.

                Did the industry stop pumping out useless junk when the Democrats held office? No. Nothing changed on that front.

                And there’s no difference between Republican and Democrat blaming each other for shit you all do.