linky to video

text

Always important to remember that a lot of these robots are “faking” the humanlike motions – its a property of how they’re trained not an inherent property of the hardware. They’re actually capable of way weirder stuff and way faster motions.

    • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I took an interview with Tesla a while back (not because I had any intention of working there, just to hear about it). Recruiter mentioned how the company is basically all in on their humanoid robot.

      I asked - why humanoid? Why not better forms or purpose-built for specific/subsets of tasks? The answer was basically Elon wants his factories operated by humanoid robots. That’s it. No greater degree of thought from one of the most “valuable” companies in the world in designing what is intended to be a flagship product.

    • LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      knowing nothing about anything (except that I’m built different, so, sorry mao but I DO have a right to comment without investigation) I’m just gonna say making robots look like people is 100% “we’re doing this to get investor money” shit, like, it’s just to get the public and rich idiots to soyface and dump money into their company, because yeah, there isn’t really a reason to ever have a robot look like a human unless it’s in some sort of “customer” facing role where it’s dealing with people and the simulation of being human might ease anxiety or tension, or if you were like, idk, trying to build replacement bodies for people (but lol at the rate we’re going I doubt that’ll ever happen, but I do expect something like “you die and they just put a chatGPT “copy” in a robot and say it’s you now, welcome to a new level of hell, society” to happen)

      if a robot is made for something it’s gotta have some sort of shape that is going to be better suited to its purpose than being humanoid. You could argue being humanoid makes it sized for humanoid spaces and tools, but like, you could just make it a different shape and still figure out a way to give it hands if you need to have it use interchangeable human tools

      • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think the human body is the way it is for a reason. It’s good at a lot of different tasks, so if you want to make a robot that can be used for a lot of different tasks (especially in a world where a lot of shit is designed around the human body) an anthropomorphic robot seems like a good idea. Like sure, a billion different hyper-specialized robot designs would be better, but are they enough better to justify the extra design time over just using the human shape we already know works?

      • Owl [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s better body plans for pretty much any specific task, but a lot of these companies are trying to make mass market robots for domestic chores. And a human body plan is the only one that everyone’s house is designed to work with.

        (PS - Holy shit don’t buy in on the domestic chore robots, rule 1 of robotics is that any robot strong enough to do something useful is strong enough to maim you.)

      • nothx [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Yeah this is my thought about it too. As someone that also knows nothing and anything, I don’t think the human body or the way we move is particularly efficient. So having robots that look and move like humans seems purely like a vanity thing.

        • LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          i’d only argue that the customer service bit isn’t really just vanity since I feel like it’s perfectly valid to expect people to feel wary towards something that looks like a biblically accurate angel speaking to them, versus something like an andoid like Data (although making Data look human was probably a vanity thing since Starfleet was filled with aliens and he coulda looked more different without shocking anyone)