

Haha good one, flakes
Checks username
whhwhawhhwhaat


You receive: apple, Sidney Sweeney, and the NBA
I Receive: the entire world’s manufacturing base (including apple’s)
we have Monsanto, Brazzers, and Clavicular. what do they have?
Monsanto
That’s owned by
IG FarbenBayer now
“We have dipshit opinion columnists. Take that, China.”
In the Empire we have perfect freedom of speech as long as we only use it to say stupid shit like this. In China they would break my fingers so I could never type again. Where would you rather live
https://www.wsj.com/opinion/free-expression/the-future-is-not-chinese-3781f318
President Trump’s visit to China has prompted Americans to reflect, as we periodically do, on the state of our superpower. Some say the future is Chinese. Don’t worry. It isn’t.
that’s all they give you for free but it would be funny if that was the whole article
With the quality of mainstream journalism today, this existing screenshot is more than I’d expect. Soon pieces will just be:
“The Future is Chinese?”
“NUH UH!”

that’s all they give you for free but it would be funny if that was the whole article
i guess for the majority of people who see it, that is the whole article.
but if you use tor or a VPN maybe you get this instead:

FUckin lmao.
CHINA CANT READ MY OPINION OF THEM TAKE THAT - the writer I guess
Seems like you are interested in the mighty American stuffs…
Nothing important here
Free Expression is a daily newsletter on American life, politics and culture from the Opinion pages of The Wall Street Journal. Sign up and start reading Free Expression today.
President Trump’s visit to China has prompted Americans to reflect, as we periodically do, on the state of our superpower. Some say the future is Chinese. Don’t worry. It isn’t.
The U.S. is rich, powerful and attractive. We are perhaps the richest, most powerful and most attractive country that’s ever been. Had we been blessed with only one of those attributes, we’d still be a formidable player on the global stage. In the event, we’re 3-for-3. We are crushing it.
Run down the list. Almost all the world’s top companies are American. The reason is simple: Ours is an open economy governed by the rule of law. Anyone can start a company and grow it. You don’t need an uncle in the Politburo.
The U.S. has Nvidia. We have Apple, Microsoft, Google, Meta and Tesla. We have the big, healthy and transparent financial institutions. We have Walmart. Our ability to project both hard and soft power is unrivaled. We have the NBA. We have the Northrop B-2 Spirit. We have Sydney Sweeney.
When you look at it that way, it’s laughable to say we are in a competition for the future with China. What do they have? What have they done? TikTok. That’s pretty much it.
Name a Chinese movie star with global box-office appeal. Name a top Chinese athlete playing in an elite sports league. Name a Chinese musician who could pack stadiums around the world like Taylor Swift or Beyoncé. Name a Chinese writer or thinker whose ideas have infiltrated the intellectual discourse. Name a clothing brand or style originating in China that has conquered the world. Name a Chinese product that you can’t live without.
You got nothing. Be honest.
Now name a recent military engagement that the Chinese have fought and won. Their soldiers are untested. Their pilots have no combat experience. Their navy plays sharks and minnows with Filipino fishing boats. Their supply chains run on the principles of corruption and inefficiency that are the communist hallmark.
There is precedent for our fear of Chinese power. In the 1970s conventional wisdom held that the Soviet Union commanded a lethal modern military machine. They had the firepower and manpower to overwhelm us in a direct confrontation. Then Soviet tanks rolled into Afghanistan and the world saw how limp the threat was. The Russians hadn’t built a war machine. They’d centrally planned a paper tiger.
No one should want war between the U.S. and China. But if it comes to that, I know which side I’d rather be on. The team that took Fallujah—twice. The team that neutralized Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. The team that snatched Maduro.
Americans have a reputation as yokels and navel-gazers. That’s not reality. We are actually quite cosmopolitan. We can be open-minded and self-critical. We read our own reviews—even the bad ones. We know what people think of us. Most of it is motivated by envy.
The reality is, the world is with us. If they could, they would be us. Nobody wants to be China.
No one in Albania or Botswana dreams of living in a low-income, censorship-and-surveillance state. They want to live in a modern, prosperous society with free and fair elections. People risk everything to come here, to build new and hopeful lives in the unsexy parts of our country—midsize cities, inner-ring suburbs, rundown areas.
Everywhere you go in the U.S. you find immigrants from around the world, raising families, building businesses, investing in their futures. That is a vote of confidence, a revealed preference. It doesn’t happen in China.
Tune out the partisan noise and the communist propaganda. China’s per-capita GDP is in the neighborhood of Mexico’s. Its economy is dominated by state-owned enterprises—phony businesses, in other words. They don’t engage in real competition in open markets. They don’t report real numbers. Everything is a mirage intended to give the illusion of strength.
You can’t steal your way to greatness. And you can’t bluff your way to hegemony.
Communism is a self-defeating ideology—impoverished, weak and ugly. So don’t worry too much about the future. It’s got America written all over it.
Mr. Hennessey is editor of Free Expression.
There is precedent for our fear of Chinese power. In the 1970s conventional wisdom held that the Soviet Union commanded a lethal modern military machine. They had the firepower and manpower to overwhelm us in a direct confrontation. Then Soviet tanks rolled into Afghanistan and the world saw how limp the threat was. The Russians hadn’t built a war machine. They’d centrally planned a paper tiger.
The U.S. may have failed in Afghanistan very recently and has only grown weaker and more failure-prone since then, but we’re still better than China, because more than forty years ago, another, different country that isn’t China also failed in Afghanistan.
Name a Chinese product that you can’t live without.
This man is either a moron or he’s doing a bit
It would be very funny to rewrite this article from the British Empire’s perspective circa 1890 and writing about the US.
Name a Chinese movie star with global box-office appeal.
Jackie Chan, Chow Yun Fat
Name a top Chinese athlete playing in an elite sports league.
Yang Hansen, Zheng Qingwen, Ma Long, Eileen Gu (retired include Yao Ming, Li Na)
the rest of this garbage is just taking red scare bullshit as gospel. clinging to it like a soothing binkie
Name a Chinese musician who could pack stadiums around the world like Taylor Swift or Beyoncé.
Jay Chow, Deng Ziqi, May Day (Wuyue tian), Joker Xue, Zhou Shen (Charlie Zhou)
All have packed out stadiums where I live, outside China
Name a Chinese writer or thinker whose ideas have infiltrated the intellectual discourse.
Liu Cunxin (was on Obama’s reading list) and the proliferation of the Dark Forest theory is influential on tech bros up to Musk. Sun Zi because every finance bro has read The Art of War thinking it’ll give them the edge
Name a clothing brand or style originating in China that has conquered the world.
Mao collar, qipao, both highly influential in their time
Name a Chinese product that you can’t live without.
Literally everything in my apartment from my fridge to my mobile, my laptop to my router

this reads like satire, lmao
Jesus christ, just say “Might makes right”. No need to have all the rest of that horseshit. Who is this convincing?
Huawei, CBA, and I mean take your pick of extremely attractive Chinese movie star because you can’t swing a cat in China without hitting like a dozen of them.
For the record Syndey Sweeney’s largest grossing film was The Housemaid at $400 million global. Zhao Liying’s largest film grossed 2.45 BILLION domestically. They aren’t even playing in the same league.
Also if anything it’s laudable that chinese female movie stars don’t get the same name recognition and downright objectification their western counterparts get.
Not saying that the Chinese film industry is a bastion of feminism. Far from it. But at least it is less gross than Hollywood (low fucking bar tho)
I wouldn’t say that. Chinese actors and actresses absolutely get the name recognition in China. It’s just that their media doesn’t really get big outside of Asia and India.
In other ways Chinese social media can be way more brutal towards famous people. There are definitely creeps in China in regards to famous people, 100%. It just happens differently than in the west. Different cultural, so the values flavor how it happens. Way too complicated for one reply and I’m not even Chinese so I’m not the best person to comment on it deeply anyways.
I’ve heard some horror stories about fame in China, that’s why I wrote the second paragraph.
You’re right that objectification can’t take the same shape as it does in the west, even if it still happens. And what I meant is that Chinese female stars are not being sexuslized worldwide in the same way that western stars are, but that just might be a product of hegemony rather than a good thing about the Chinese film industry.
Yes but have you considered blonde hair and booba?

Checkmate, liberals.
Imagine thinking that soft power through pop culture is actual material power lol
The first helps a lot to create the second tho, otherwise Europe and Latam wouldn’t be so fucking cucked by The Great Satan
It’s the other way around tho. Gunboat diplomacy for latam and the Marshall plan for Europe established the material groundwork for American culture to grow in.
It’s a feedback loop
deleted by creator
Yes, the word above ‘creates’ was misplaced. However, the cultural hegemony has grown into a beast which has helped reformed that material basis many times over since
Cultural hegemony also maintains the material base of empire by making the metropole’s priorities and perspective “common sense”, it just happens that common sense always works out in its favor. .
Base and superstructure etc.
Exactly. I think it’s also worth noting that it’s not as if soft power isn’t material. Soft power is not idealism it’s just not as straightforward as direct military might. What Alaskaball said is true of course, but those things also feed back into soft power which in turn makes US hegemony, military dominance, and imperialism (like gunboat diplomacy, Marshall plan, etc.) more accepted and even supported by the vassals and the imperialized populations. Not unlike how base and superstructure both form a reinforcing and reproducing feedback loop with each other.
For someone who has never had an iPhone, doesn’t watch sport and who(?), the future is very much Chinese
White supremacy Barbie girl surely is very popular among non-western countries who have, obviously, no women
Chinese women are famously too busy holding up half the sky to be hot
Sydney Sweeney isn’t going to get me stable shelter and healthcare, Matt
I swear US bougies are so stuck in the 80s that they really do think the same “But we have rock music and Coke!” shit is going to work while most of us have bigger problems than entertaining ourselves to deal with now.
We have rock n roll coca cola Santa!
We even had a rock n roller-coaster until wokeness made disney replace the wholesome keanu chungus pedo rock band with Muppets
okay, okay. yes there is HUAWEI, yes there is a popular China Basketball Association. but China does not have any women
oh yea gotta love Sweeney’s dead eyes
Yeah I really don’t understand the over-the-top infatuation with her in particular. She’s not that great of an actress from what I can tell. She has a very flat affect (the “dead eyes” you mention) which can be a good thing and just what certain roles call for but not great for versatility and expressivness in general. And there are countless other conventionally beautiful actresses that can check off all the same tickboxes for mass/pop-culture appeal that Sweeny can. I guess it all has to do with being in the right place at the right time and doing a bit of work in some crass and culture-war adjacent things, like that dog-whistley jeans commercial, that made the chuds latch onto her symbolically as the quintessential Murican woman.
Right place right time, mostly. She’s an attractive white and blonde woman playing a sexually active (and available) teenager in a show right at the tail end of “woke” fiction’s peak. Her debut was so over the top sexuslized that it thrust her into the zeitgeist as a sex object first and an actress second in a way that hadn’t been seen since around the 90s.
It was until this comment (specifically about a jeans commercial) that I thought “maybe I’m thinking of the wrong actress” because I was imagining Tilda Swinton modeling jeans and that seemed a little strange.
it’s mostly her chest
Plenty of other actresses with
booba too.
idk there’s been 25 years of one busty white woman at a time being popular in hollywood but she leans into it more or something, i don’t follow celebrity stuff so i only get the leakage.
I think that’s the reason why the chuds love her, it’s basically their fantasy
Productive capacity
How about not having those things?
Basketball is the most played sport in China.






















