• P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I can’t see SpaceX not getting nationalized in 6-10 years, assuming we make it that long.

      • OhneHose@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        If the American gov wouldn’t be insane, integrating space X into NASA would be an enormous benefit to humanity in general.

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        SpaceX was built up to not be a government agency. They have received many subsidies that could have been spent on NASA. The US had decided to privatize their space industry. Why should they undo it?

        E.g. Starlink in Ukraine is just a private company. It’s not an official involvement of the US in the war.

    • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think midrange investors, upper middle class people with investments, have more to worry about.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Have you seen people migrate in huge numbers from X to mastodon or Reddit to Lemmy? The oligarchs in the US are fully in control. People crave Capitalism.

      • Melchior@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        and that can change over night. Seriously media is powerful, but it is pretty easy to have a billionaire thrown into say Guantanamo and tortured until he signs over his wealth or at least most of it. That is sort of what China does and it seems to work.

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          That is sort of what China does and it seems to work.

          Do you think that’s possible in the US?

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Each of them wants to be a monopolist.

          The monopolies, that is Capitalism. Free markets with competition is not Capitalism because then people with capital don’t have much power.

          • glasratz@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            You can see it that way, but most billionaires we have today aren’t monopolitsts but are completely beyond the reach of the law and buy out governments.

          • Vergissmeinnicht@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            you’re conflating capitalism with plutocracy.

            And yeah, capitalism will lead to plutocracy if left unchecked, but they’re not the same thing.

            • plyth@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              capitalism will lead to plutocracy if left unchecked

              But is it Capitalism if it is checked? If something stands above capitalism and controls it, then that is the governing philosophy and deserves the -ism, not capital.

              • Vergissmeinnicht@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                If something stands above capitalism and controls it, then that is the governing philosophy and deserves the -ism, not capital.

                capitalism isn’t a form of governance it’s an economic system.

                Democracy is a form of governance, so is plutocracy, or monarchy, or aristocracy.

                Many different forms of governance can structure their economy using capitalism.

                But a capitalist economy will always push the current form government towards plutocracy

  • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    From the article: '…The value of the assets seized from Moshkovich exceeds that of several other high-profile nationalization cases that have reshaped Russia’s business landscape in recent years.

    Those include the confiscation of seafood magnate Oleg Kan’s “crab empire,” valued at about $4.3 billion; Moscow’s Domodedovo Airport, valued at 320 billion rubles ($4.42 billion); gold producer Yuzhuralzoloto, controlled by billionaire Konstantin Strukov and estimated to be worth around $2 billion; assets belonging to former Yugra Bank owner Alexei Khotin worth more than 200 billion rubles ($2.76 billion); pasta producer Makfa, valued at roughly 100 billion rubles ($1.38 billion); PVC manufacturer Sayanskkhimplast, valued at 92 billion rubles ($1.27 billion); and car dealer Rolf, valued at about 60 billion rubles ($828 million).

    …The agency reported that billionaire Suleiman Kerimov, whose fortune is estimated at $11.6 billion by the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, offered during a closed-door meeting with Putin in March to contribute 100 billion rubles ($1.38 billion) to the state budget.

    Bloomberg reported that the federal budget subsequently received 220 billion rubles ($3.04 billion) in what officials described as gratuitous contributions following Putin’s annual meeting with leading business executives.’

    He’s shaking them down.