Lemmy.one
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
git [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net to technology@hexbear.netEnglish · 4 days ago

UK will force Apple and Google to block nude images for kids

thenextweb.com

external-link
message-square
20
fedilink
43
external-link

UK will force Apple and Google to block nude images for kids

thenextweb.com

git [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net to technology@hexbear.netEnglish · 4 days ago
message-square
20
fedilink
The UK will legislate to make Apple and Google block nude images on children's phones. Child safety groups back it; privacy experts warn of scanning.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • ClimateStalin [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t want to hear a god damn word about stopping teenagers from looking at porn until you put Musk and Zuckerberg in handcuffs for distributing CSAM

  • darkcalling [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 days ago

    Today nude images for kids. Tomorrow memes deemed to be Russian or Chinese propaganda for everyone (which will start out as “accidentally” being flagged as nudity because they’ll just train their models to see it as that). Next decade: allow-list only mode, all unauthorized memes not sanctified by the crown blocked.

  • SorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 days ago

    Let me guess, big titties will be censored but republican men who go on discord and groom 14 year olds won’t be?

    • Gumus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s supposed to censor all nudity when kids are the users of the device

      • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        So, yes, it’s inevitably going to censor big clothed boobies and will never even try to manage GOPedos.

  • FnordPrefect [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 days ago

    libertarian-approaching “Oh, PHEW, it says for kids…”

  • DasRav [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    I wonder if kids might lie to access such restricted material? No, that would never happen.

    This is obviously a thin veil over politicians cooming their brains out at the idea of forcing a surveillance program on every device you and I own.

  • Carl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    For a second I thought it was for ai generated csam, but no.

  • TUMBLE_BUS [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    Oi guv, what am aye suppose ta do when I want to ave a wank then?

  • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    Serious question - has the UK banned VPNs?

    If not - how can blocking nudes work? British teens can get a VPN and log in from the Netherlands or wherever.

    • chgxvjh [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is not about network filters. They want phones to scan through pictures on the device.

      • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 days ago

        The replies in this thread are very depressing. I knew things in the UK were bad but I had no idea how bad. Yeesh.

        • chgxvjh [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          I’m surprised that nobody has followed political developments on that matter in the UK and EU or read the article

      • not@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Who are pushing this? Islamists? Christians?

        • chgxvjh [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore

    • O__O [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      It will use on-device scanning so vpns are completely useless to stop it. When the phone tries to open the nude image, whether it is in a message or on a website or in the camera roll, the phone will detect it is a nude and refuse to display it. Maybe with an optional notification to a government server or parent.

    • Carl [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      the pipeline is under construction, the final form is hardware age verification on every device

      • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yikes.

    • doleo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      I guess they’re taking an educated gamble on the kids not being able to operate a basic VPN.

      But more to the point, as ever, this has got nothing to do with blocking nudes for minors, its got everything to do with forcing porn-seeking adults to identify themselves. In my option.

      • NephewAlphaBravo [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        it’s a subset of forcing everyone to de-anonymize online

technology@hexbear.net

technology@hexbear.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@hexbear.net

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

  • Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
  • The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
  • Great libre software on Windows
  • Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!

Rules:

  • 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
  • 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
  • 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
  • 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
  • 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
  • 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
  • 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 262 users / day
  • 757 users / week
  • 1.32K users / month
  • 2.45K users / 6 months
  • 18 local subscribers
  • 24.5K subscribers
  • 4.49K Posts
  • 38.8K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • context [fae/faer, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
  • SexUnderSocialism [she/her]@hexbear.net
  • gaycomputeruser [she/her]@hexbear.net
  • Wakmrow [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • SwitchyandWitchy [she/her]@hexbear.net
  • JustSo [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org