• cholesterol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    384
    ·
    1 month ago

    The dump truck, at 45 tons, ascends the 13-percent grade and takes on 65 tons of ore. With more than double the weight going back down the hill, the beast’s regenerative braking system recaptures more than enough energy to refill the charge the eDumper used going up.

    • ladicius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      335
      ·
      1 month ago

      So the energy this truck uses is harnessed via mining and loading… Essentially this energy was stored in the ore via geological processes.

      This truck uses continental drift as his fuel.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      1 month ago

      Kinda like the mine in the UK that use a cableway without a motor to bring ore down and empty buckets up

    • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 month ago

      So it was designed for this mine I guess?

      I’m not sure there’s a lot of mine you’re going down filled up, the images I have in mind are quite the opposite, but that’s a really cool idea!

      There actually is some design to stock energy this way, with weights you lift while having excess energy

      • groet@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        1 month ago

        Depends on the scale of “going down”. Many mines are in the mountains and the material has to be brought down to lower elevations. The mine entry may be lower than the nearest pass but still a lot higher than the destination of the ore.

        • TomSelleck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Open pit is much more common for this type of equipment and it’s basically a reverse mountain. Still might be enough regenerative braking from just the weight of the truck though.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            1 month ago

            Still might be enough regenerative braking from just the weight of the truck though.

            In that case no, because it’d be bringing the weight of the truck and the ore with it.

          • groet@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            An open pit at an elevation of 1.5km still means the bottom of the pit could be 1km higher than the place the ore is processed at

      • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you’re thinking of that CGI crane lifting concrete blocks, it’s unfortunately a really bad idea.

        Pumped hydro stores energy by lifting weight uphill, instead. Water is basically the cheapest thing you can get per tonne, and is easy to contain and move.

        To store useful amounts of energy using gravity, you need pretty large elevation differences and millions of tonnes of mass to move.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          I love that I knew this conversation was going to happen as soon as I read the article.

          And, yes.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I guess it all depends on the physical layout but this seems like a very complicated way to get material downhill.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    146
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Amateurs.

    The 1963 Černý Důl – Kunčice nad Labem aerial ropeway is over 8 km (5 mi) long, over 30 m high in places and carries 135 tons of limestone every hour from a quarry to the nearest train station. Its 120kW 3-phase synchronous motor requires power for a few minutes at the start and end of each day when most of the 800kg-capacity trolleys are empty, and spends most of the shift generating mains electricity and acting as a speed governor. Unlike the EV, it is fully autonomous most of the way, only 5 people are required to operate it. (Loading, unloading and timed dispatching is automatic, arriving/leaving carts just need to be checked; a safety latch has to be manually dis/engaged on trolleys passing the check.) The quarry will continue operation as long as it pays off, then the ropeway will be scrapped (projected 2033). A dude illegally rode the way up on it somewhat recently. He could have fallen to his death if he pulled the latch.

    • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if there are electrified railway lines doing the same. Regenerate large amounts of energy into the grid while descending loaded; consume a relatively small amount of energy to haul the empty train back uphill.

    • residentmarchant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Content aside, what a great video! It’s not that old of a video but it reminds me so much of early YouTube, just friends messing around and posting it with top tier song choice.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I know, this one is shorter and has mechanical brakes. Not as great but I imagine the Czech one, one of the largest in Europe, has very few English-language sources that could have pointed it out to him. I don’t know whether the Claughton one cannot be ridden or Tom is just squeamish about safety (see description) but the Černý Důl one definitely can, that’s how they do routine inspections.

  • Soleos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    EV never has to be recharged… Because it recharges on the way downhill.

    “World’s largest EV never has to be plugged in” is sufficiently click-baity without being so dumbly self contradicting

    • locuester@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 month ago

      More like “never has to stop working to charge”. It is novel that its charging mechanism operates as a function of doing its primary job.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not novel. I think there was a train somewhere in Africa, that transported some ore from mountain to port. On the way down with ore it charged and uphill it used charge.

        • locuester@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Is novel for a dump truck to use this. Of course it’s not a completely new concept entirely.

        • Pulptastic@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That’s genius. Who cares if thermodynamics wins, it weighs less on the way up so works out just fine.

          Just like the example in TFA.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Reminds me of some guy with a OneWheel that was saying he’d never charged his board in like a thousand miles as his daily commuter.

      He lives near the top of a mountain lift, so he takes it home and just runs on pure regen lol.

      • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        So he’s just breaking? What a silly thing to claim. I bet he’s not even regening a lot. When i ride up a mountain until my battery is down to 40% or so and ride down i regenerate around 1% or something. It might even be in the 0.6% or something

    • shastaxc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah I was gonna say I’m pretty sure this isn’t a single use, disposable vehicle

  • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 month ago

    “World’s largest EV”

    Blatantly untrue. Larger EVs have been in use for more than a century at this point in the form of EMU trains.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not very smart that they waste all that energy in mechanical brakes. See my comment (the one with the picture) for a way bigger and electricity-generating ropeway, including a video of a guy less squeamish than Tom Scott riding most of the 45-minute way up.

          • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            He literally has

            Filmed safely: https://www.tomscott.com/safe/

            in the description. Meanwhile, that fat dude from Vrchlabí jumped into a moving bucket of one that is faster, 2.5x longer, at deadly height, and his only plan of getting down safely was a mattress. He acknowledged how illegal and dangerous it is and yet publishes the video with his full name.

            Just accept it, Tom Scott was being way more cautious.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Well yes but it does also recharge itself by going downhill while loaded and storing power from regenerative brakes. Then it drops the load and has enough charge to drive back up. The power is coming from it being loaded at the top.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I know how it works. I was making a joke by applying the concept of disposable e-waste junk to a massive dump truck.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes but your comment was in every way indistinguishable from a comment by an idiot who had no idea how it worked, didn’t read the article, and commented an incorrect explanation anyways.

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            You truly believe someone thought that you would just throw away an entire dump truck when the battery died?

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Depends on how easy it is to remove the battery and how many replacement batteries are on the market.

              Also a bit of a ship of theseus issue where if the truck gets refurbished by the company then is it the same truck?

              These things are very large and very few in number. I know nothing about the company behind its production.

              So it is possible.

  • sircac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 month ago

    I cannot avoid to be pedantic on this, it is recharged during half the trip… it just does not require plug-like recharging

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yeah another clickbait headline. It’s getting recharged all the time, it’s just very lucky to be in a use case where it goes down hills with large loads all the time

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s more than a clickbait headline, the first paragraph is just flat out wrong:

        Perhaps best of all, it consumes no energy doing it.

        Obviously it’s consuming energy going uphill. Just because the power source is gravity doesn’t mean it’s not consuming energy.

  • Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    Till elon finds out that if he manages to cover the sun, he can charge us on sunscription

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Pretty sure its also not solar. The machine gets loaded with weight at the top of the hill, its regenerative brakes store power on the way down, it drops the load off, and the lightened machine stored enough charge to drive back up.

  • mEEGal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    well that was unexpected

    I’m curious if the desgin team knew about it in advance

      • mEEGal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        hahaha guess it boils down to that 😂

        but I was specifically wondering if they built the vehicle with a charger and ended up never using it, to their own surprise. or if they knew they’d (almost) never have to charge it

        • Venicon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Must have a cable somewhere as a backup otherwise you’d need a full battery replacement should it ever be discharged.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Gonna go ahead and guess that when designing a 110 ton mega dump truck things are probably pretty front loaded on the planning side of things.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    yes it does. just going by the numbers posted operating in the space it does results in a net loss of12% battery each trip.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    I read the story.

    I saw the comments on the story

    I laughed at the pedantic slapfights happening in the comments.

    I came here to comment on the neat story and poke fun at the silliness, to find the same pedantic slapfights here.

    Sigh.

  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m no phycisist but I’d bet that the claim “it consumes no energy” is almost certainly false. I get what they mean but this isn’t exactly a honest way to describe it.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Strictly speaking, the energy it consumes is the gravitational potential energy of the ore they’re mining, which would be consumed anyway in the form of, well, gravity, acting on the ore on the way down. They’re just using it productively instead of dissipating it as heat from the brakes. Using only energy that ordinarily would have been wasted is of course very neat, but it’s not breaking any laws of physics.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I think it means that the net energy consumption is zero. It can use energy, but it generates enough to offset it.