• Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I would support a better version of this.

    Deficit is a major piece. They talk about it and then invariably increase it every time.

    RNC lowers taxes, technically, but only ever in a way that hurts working class. DNC leave it all as is, never changing the bottom line.

    First draft meme, here.

  • HiddenLychee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    13 hours ago

    DNC never sent DHS and ice to deport and create fake crimes against my Muslim friend for being an Iranian student in physics. But sure, both sides.

  • Octagon9561@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The fact that there are so many dislikes proves how propagandized the average American is. “How dare you call both sides the same” Well, they ojectively are pretty much the same with few exceptions.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Especially for non-Usian people, doubly especially for those on the working end of US “diplomacy” - bombs, coups and sanctions come regardless of which US administration, there is literally no difference whatsoever.

    • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      13 hours ago

      One side supports a criminal Nazi apologist who tried to overthrow our Democracy and hasn’t given up yet. The other side brings a knife to the gun fight.

      They’re not even remotely the same. 40 years ago that may have been closer to true.

        • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Rather, I’m arguing against “enlightened centrism”. Both sides are not the same at all, there is one party clearly better than the other. Not defending the US in general. But if everyone voted Democrat our problems would be greatly improved.

          If there were two parties, one to double the slaves, and another to keep the number of slaves the same, I would vote for the second party. If everyone voted for the second party, they’d eventually be able to pitch reducing the number of slaves. But they can’t because half the country is Nazis. It’s a dirty game but it’s one worth playing, even if we use protests and other tools as well.

          • Tomorrow_Farewell [any, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Rather, I’m arguing against “enlightened centrism”

            Your instance has been very supportive of ‘enlightened centrism’ when it comes to colonialism vs anti-colonialism. Let’s hope that you are, in fact, opposed to that.

            However, the opposition to both of the parties is not a case of ‘enlightened centrism’. They are literally both right-wing genocidal factions of rulers of NATO.

            Both sides are not the same at all

            In the case of USian ruling factions, the difference is just PR. And, maybe, competence in conducting genocides, invasions, and other colonialist activities.

            there is one party clearly better than the other

            Considering that the current administration has seemingly been making decisions that have been harmful to NATO’s ability to invade the rest of the world in the long term, it seems that the party that currently holds more power is the better one.

            But if everyone voted Democrat our problems would be greatly improved

            How?

            If there were two parties, one to double the slaves, and another to keep the number of slaves the same, I would vote for the second party

            Both of the parties are for doubling the slaves and for conducting genocides. The currently dominant one seems to be less competent when it comes to achieving those goals.

            But they can’t because half the country is Nazis

            Much more than that - almost all USians were in favour of invading Iraq, and I find it likely that not much has changed.
            Either way, both of those parties are at least almost completely nazi.

            It’s a dirty game but it’s one worth playing

            Why? Electoralist efforts have evidently not achieved much throughout their existence. It’s time to accept reality.

            • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I don’t know what my instance believes, nor do I care.

              I wouldn’t argue against opposing both parties, or the US in general. I’m American and I choose to vote for the party that seems substantially better. Voting correctly is important, but not enough.

              Voting Republican caused Ukraine to lose its funding. I don’t side with any genocide that NATO commits but don’t forget it also protects billions of people. The game is dirty and imperfect but we should still play it to survive.

              Democrat policies reduce wealth inequality, which Republican ones increase it.

              All Nazis are Republicans. Few to none are Democrats.

              Basically none of your arguments are rooted in truth, even slightly. I doubt you will be convinced of what I’m saying.

              • Tomorrow_Farewell [any, they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Voting correctly is important

                Has voting ever produced any sort of serious effect in the US?

                Voting Republican caused Ukraine to lose its funding

                Meaning that the state of Ukraine will have less of a reason and less of an ability to avoid peace negotiations to stop the bloodshed. This is good.

                but don’t forget it also protects billions of people

                It literally does the opposite. It’s a colonial empire that is conducting a genocide right now and that has been invading everywhere in the world to keep billions of people in a colonial yoke. It only defends colonial metropoles and settler-colonies from justice.
                Furthermore, at most, it ‘protects’ about a billion of people, and not ‘billions’.

                All Nazis are Republicans. Few to none are Democrats

                They are almost all nazis. Even if one cares about electoralism, almost all Dems who could voted against reduction of military support for Pissrael.
                It’s not really arguable that at least almost all Dems are in favour of genocides and invasions - like the ones into Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Afghanistan.

                Basically none of your arguments are rooted in truth, even slightly

                Except for all of them.
                Notably, you couldn’t even provide examples of non-nazi Dems, and lied about NATO protecting billions of people and keep lying about voting being important despite having nothing to show for it.

                • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  Are you over in Gaza right now, attempting to bypass the blockade and deliver relief to the individuals who suffer?

                  If not, can you prove you’re not soulless?

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        11 hours ago

        One side supports a criminal Nazi apologist who tried to overthrow our Democracy and hasn’t given up yet.

        And the other side commits genocide. It also overthrows other people’s democracy, but you don’t consider foreigners human.

          • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Most Democrats express greater sympathy for Palestinians. That’s not what I would call “committing genocide”.

            Committing genocide is committing genocide. What the fuck is wrong with you?

            What I see is Democrat officials expressing support, but powerless against Republicans who do not.

            Then you had your eyes closed for all of 2024

            That’s not supporting genocide. We’re fighting, but losing.

            Genocide denier

            • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              57 minutes ago

              Ok, I’ll return your argument strategy exactly as you stated it:

              "Are you in Gaza bypassing the blockade and delivering relief to the affected people right now?

              If not, you are a genocide denier and had your eyes closed for all of 2025. What the fuck is wrong with you? You shameful asshole. People are dying and you don’t even give a fuck. You have nothing more to say that I care about until you personally feed an affected person. Hypocrite."

              • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                54 minutes ago

                Ok, I’ll return your argument strategy exactly as you stated it: [Some thing that in no way resembles anything I said]

                You people really cannot behave in good faith, can you?

                If not, you are a genocide denier and had your eyes closed for all of 2025. What the fuck is wrong with you? You shameful asshole. People are dying and you don’t even give a fuck. You have nothing more to say that I care about until you personally feed an affected person. Hypocrite."

                Incoherent. But I guess I shouldn’t expect more from a genocide apologist fuck like you.

                • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  52 minutes ago

                  Alright, let me return your argument again:

                  “I have nothing more to say to you, Nazi. Literally you’re a white supremacist who thinks Jews and immigrants are subhuman. If I can’t drive a false narrative, you’re acting in bad faith!!!”

            • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              They did. They were all pardoned by Trump. Trump would have been sent to prison if he didn’t win the election. Our Democracy is working, it reflects the idiocy of over half our population who voted for everyone to jump off a cliff.

              When I walk around, over half the people I talk to support Trump. The other half is actively fighting against it. That’s not support. We’re merely losing.

              • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Trump would have been sent to prison if he didn’t win the election.

                Trump would never have had the chance if Biden elected an AG who didn’t spend 4 years fucking around.

                The other half is actively fighting against it

                Its a shame the democrats dont represent those people and chose not to dismantle Trump’s ICE and instead tried to work with republicans.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The DNC isn’t fighting for workers. They are bringing a gun to the gunfight, they just aren’t interested in using it against the GOP, as ultimately both serve capital. The US has never been a democracy for the people.

        • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Democrats seek to regulate said capital. The Overton window is too far right to have much effect.

          Serving capital does not mean we’re not a Democracy. Attempting a coup of the government and disinformation does, however.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            54 minutes ago

            They only seek to regulate capital as much as their megacorp and billionaire donors wish. The “Overton Window” has nothing to do with it.

            Further, if both parties serve capital, then we have democracy for capital, not for the people.

            • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              49 minutes ago

              Not much argument there, but the Overton window has everything to do with it. How do you think other Democrat socialist countries got where they were? At some point they were all pretty much in our boat. I haven’t lost hope yet.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                37 minutes ago

                There are no “democratic socialist” countries. Democratic Socialism is a descriptor for reformist socialism, the closest we got was Salvador Allende in Chile. Socialism isn’t just “social programs,” socialism refers to a mode of production where public ownership is the principle aspect of the economy, ie the large firms and key industries. The Nordic countries are Social Democracies, welfare capitalism essentially.

                The Nordic Countries have the large safety nets they do largely due to proximity with the USSR, who was the first to dramatically expand their safety nets. Combined with millitant labor organizing, these concessions in other countries forced the bourgeoisie’s hand. The problem is that these social safety nets in the global north are funded through imperialism, vast extraction from the global south.

                The Overton Window has nothing to do with it. The system is dominated by capitalists, the only way to get even a fraction of what the workers want is through millitant organizing and running our own parties like PSL, the only way to actually get socialism is through revolution.

                • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  31 minutes ago

                  To most, Democratic Socialism and Social Democracy mean the same thing. Since actual Socialism is usually so irrelevant it requires no clarification. Since you’re an actual socialist I’m gonna doubt we have any constructive dialogue from here on out.

                  But for the record I don’t believe violent revolution is a winning strategy. It’s a failed experiment that killed millions and it won’t work this time either. Neither is sitting back and hoping things work out, so I can’t dock you.

          • Tomorrow_Farewell [any, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Democrats seek to regulate said capital

            No, they aren’t.

            Serving capital does not mean we’re not a Democracy

            If you think that you live under a democracy, i.e. that your government’s decisions reflect your wishes, then you should be held accountable for the genocides and invasions that your state keeps committing.

            Attempting a coup of the government and disinformation does, however.

            The US suffering a coup would at worst not make anything worse, including in terms of ‘democracy’.

          • KatakiY@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            No they want to appear to regulate capital. Most of the time they don’t actually want to regulate it. Yes they won’t be as overt as to do the massive wealth transfers they the republicans do . But they will. Who was president in 08 ? Who continued to dump money into our military contracts despite running as anti war?

            Like yeah the parties are different domestically but foreign policy wise the outcomes are usually the same.

            • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Most right wing policies done by Democrats are necessary because of the electoral college. There is resistance from the right, and Democrats working within the unfair rules need to appease these swing state voters through compromise. Those compromises are ugly and unfair. It’s not usually because they want to appease billionaires. But definitely there is corruption on both sides. Just 10x as much on the right.

                • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  😂 I mean for one, the entire presidential election was purchased by a few rich people who used disinformation tactics. Then taxes for the rich were eradicated at the expense of everyone else. That’s the exact opposite of the Democrat’s political ideology. I should say 1000x. I’ll call it “orders of magnitude” instead.

                  So where did you get 1.98?

    • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      “Everyone who is an adult who realizes there is no unicorn party is completely propagandized. I am le very smart.”

  • Awkwardparticle@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    16 hours ago

    One side created secret police and are kidnapping people off of the streets to put into concentration camps. End of fucking discussion.

      • admin@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        When Trump terminated the USAID, Some very liberal who used to advocate for “Women and children” people came out with how No USAID means the USA will lose leverage,like We know you don’t care but at least don’t promote such disgusting foulplays.

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Biden didn’t shut down any of the ICE concentration camps Trump opened the last time he was president.

      Also Guantanamo Bay has had bipartisan support since the beginning.

    • ShotDonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Building on a police state that was 50% pre-built by The Other Party™ but hey who could have thought that bad guys could ever take advantage of it!

      • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Exactly. When terrorists take over a police station it’s really the police’s fault for existing the first place.

      • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        So what you’re saying is that the electorates are completely different? Exactly. Thanks for that.

          • KatakiY@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I agreed with you about the actual issue but wtf. You do realize the United States has 340 million people and lager that whatever country you likely love in, right? There are many diverse political postions here, but you won’t see them in our duopoly…

            Like yeah the Dems played a roll in funding and using the police state. They want itm they love West wing TV style politics where they think they are the good guys and can’t critically consider any positive future and therefore end up being shit libs at best.

            The republicans actively want to kill everyone for profit.

  • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    My parents are lifelong Democrats. When I ask them questions about any specific policy, they are vehemently against if it involves raising taxes even slightly. Voting Democrat makes them feel better about themselves. They always ask me to fill their ballots in, I have to refuse and lecture them every time. They love CNN.

      • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Simple English: My parents vote Democrat but don’t support Democrat policies. They are staunch Libertarians who think voting Democrat makes them look good to their children. They also don’t like to vote and want their children to decide for them, which is antidemocratic. They watch news outlets that spew disinformation. They’re not much different from most Republicans. I suspect many other Americans are the same.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Not sure ableism is the best way to spread your message, but the fact is that the largest block of eligable voters sat out because they feel that voting isn’t worth it, be it for being in a state that’s solidly red or blue, or because neither option makes a tangible difference on their lives. Both the DNC and GOP serve capital, not the workers, so they are going to continue to alienate the working class.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    21 hours ago
    > republicans
    > hostility to Russia
    

    Let me guess, your preferred form of government is “petty dictator killing people for not following the same exact lifestyle as he wants, but virtue signals to communism”.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Except MAGA is not neoliberalism unless we think tariffs are now “free trade”. I get the point that neither party will wield power against capitalism, but they still use their power differently.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    22 hours ago

    DNC is a huge problem with America as was Biden/Garland. They need/needed Trump to not fall out of a window, or be in military jail, in order for the most warmongering neocon DNC candidates to ensure warmongering. After Oct 7th, DNC’s Israel first “job is to gaslight the left into supporting Israel”, meant ensuring Trump’s win, and today, have their elected Zionist supremacists, repeat attacks of communism on Mamdani.

    On global warming, forcing a proxy war on Russia, not only enriches domestic oil companies to fund climate denial. pushing global diesel (home heating fuel same fraction) refining capacity to limit, with massive emissions from war, it also means no cooperation with Russia possible on global warming. It is simply impossible to prioritize human sustainability, if voters are made to support war, while struggling with the economic collapse directly accelerated by it, not to mention cultural divisiveness issues (not DNC/Biden fault).

    The US needs either a military coup, or candidates/party that will remove citizenship and assets of Zionist oligarchy influencing US rulership. If money is speech, then money is terrorism.

    • crankyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      We have to have two, to keep the masses fighting, thinking one will bring change the other can’t. It takes the eye off the ball from the oligarchs, industrial war machine, the three rogue letter spy agencies, and most of all the Zionist influence. Brain-dead voters will scream across the isle at each other, “but my candidate is slightly better than your candidate!” Logic has left the room.

  • bassomitron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Don’t remember the last time the Democrats had military storming our streets and black bagging US residents en masse and deporting them to war zones like South Sudan or Libya despite those people having zero ties to those countries.

    This reeks of fucking shitpost right-wing propaganda.

    Edit: here come all the “but the US/CIA did all this fucked up stuff to other countries under Dems, too!”

    JFC, the current “president” who is GOP literally yells about wanting to deport/arrest political opponents, censor TV personalities (e.g. Colbert, Fallon, etc), openly calls to suppress political opposition in voting, openly supports ignoring the courts when they interfere with his blatantly unconstitutional actions, etc etc .

    Yes, the Dems aren’t fucking innocent, but to pretend they’re the same as a party that’s openly trying to “take back the Nazi word” is fucking insane.

    • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Off the top off my head the national guard during the george floyd protest that got called in by tim walz. Even trump was “impressed”

    • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      the Democrats had military storming our streets and black bagging US residents en masse

      The Posse Comitatus Act is what generally prevents military from “black bagging US residents” and leaves that job to police.

      Texas was the first state to allow for the national guard to assist in immigration efforts back in 2021. Democrats did nothing to stop, delay or prevent the expansion of those powers which were further pushed and nationalized in 2025.

      The other loophole is invoking the insurrection act. While Biden did not involve it it was repeatedly threatened during the Gaza war protests, however the protests never got too riotous for the Dems to risk damaging their image and the local police were perfectly capable of documenting and black bagging people for it.

      The cases of Kahlil and Mahdawi where Trump attended to deport individuals participating in those protests was made possible by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. That specific bill was introduced by the Democrats, passed the Democratic majority House and Senate, Vetoed by Democratic president Truman before being overridden by the house/Senate.

      You are correct that they are “not the same”, but stating that the shield of your enemy is your friend, just because it isn’t a sword is fucking insane.

    • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      They’re not the same. The Dems stand back and shake their fist/wring their hands when the Repubs have power and run roughshod over them. Then when the Dems have power they allow their efforts to be thwarted by the Repubs and gesture helplessly when in fact they could just push things through themselves.

      Also the DNC is a malfunctioning toilet that costs elections, implying that they think it’s better to have a pro-establishment Repub in power than a Dem maverick.

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      The problem is that both parties are right wings, only one somewhat more extreme. Both defends the rights of big corporations, billonairs and less or nothing those of the rest of the people. Public services, labor rights and even basic rights, like health and education are a bad joke in the US and only available if you have money. Now with Trump it goes even worse.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 day ago

      war zones like South Sudan or Libya despite those people having zero ties to those countries.

      Damn I wonder why Libya is like that!

      You absolute ghouls literally don’t see foreigners as human

      • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I dont think there is a lib alive who remembers the dems role in the destruction of Libya other than those directly involved in it.

      • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        22 hours ago

        since the end of ww2 the two major coup d’états in brazil happened with direct support of the department of state and the cia under dem administration (johnson was in power in 64 and obama, with hillary clinton in charge of the department of state, in 2016). we’ve got a story or two to tell about them. if the regular lib doesn’t care about that, then the most natural thing for us is to consider both parties equally harmful and don’t give a damn over internal issues of the us and a.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Everything except complete submission to the US State department reeks of Russian propaganda to .worlders

    • redsunrise@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      One half-baked concession to the poor doesn’t imply their party platform is about improving the lives of poor people.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I credit Dems with making Mitt Romney’s healthcare plan worse, by removing the public option - the thing that would have actually improved the lives of poorer people. Instead, we simply shoveled some 30mil Americans right into the pockets of predatory insurance companies.

      The only silver lining from that legislation was preventing them from denying care due to pre-existing conditions, and that point has been an all out battleground ever since.

    • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Obamacare is responsible for finding the masses in my breasts right now so I like it. I’d like it more if just everyone could go to the doctor and not have to ask, like I do, “is it covered by my insurance”