Lemmy.one
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 17 hours ago

Who is he?

piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone

message-square
152
fedilink
597

Who is he?

piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone

LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 17 hours ago
message-square
152
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • M137@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    42 minutes ago

    That’s just John Testosterone, we don’t talk about him.

  • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Obviously it’s Brian Boitano

  • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    deleted by creator

    • SirHery@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      49 minutes ago

      ಠ_ಠ wha… what do you mean? Genuinely what do you mean by that.

      • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        47 minutes ago

        It’s literally correlating testosterone with intelligence

  • Psydefisch@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I bet on Dulph Lundgren

  • lb_o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It is obviously John Carmack

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    8 hours ago

    styropyro

    He has some mystery condition where his testosterone is super high… He’s very smart, but maybe not quite there.

    • Banana@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      32 minutes ago

      That’s literally who I thought about and I’m so glad someone mentioned it. He’s a freakishly smart dude.

    • sangeteria@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      How is he now btw? Is he getting treated? Did they find a root cause?

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        He’s posted very little on it. Last we heard they didn’t find any cancers or anything and he wasn’t really suffering from it. He had some strange symptoms and it it just came up in tests that didn’t like up with what he was there for. But it was really really high.

    • mavu@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 hours ago

      high five, random internet poster. I came here to make a similar comment :)

  • solidheron@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Hmmm, I wonder if testosterone keeps people from doing nerd shit like taking tests

  • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Oh, the Brendan Fraser in Bedazzled when he wished to be sophisticated, suave… Or Tony Stark.

    Also, how did they get this data? Do they steal samples at night then check grades during the day?

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 hours ago

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      What happened to his face?

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        8 hours ago

        A stressful residency

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Is it this guy? I’ve always imagined him as an erudite scholar.

  • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Dolph Lundgren?

  • Rookeh@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    9 hours ago

  • friendlycheese@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Not a real study but okay

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 hours ago

    • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      If you remove the anomaly, which may be due to an accidental additional digit, that correlation coefficient may climb a bit.

      • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        IMHO, they plotted an independent variable over random noise. The one gigathad changes nothing.

        • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I think there’s a clear correlation there, but the axes are reversed: testosterone can’t be the dependent variable of IQ score. Reversing the axes makes the gradient look incredibly steep, but that’s only because of the obviously incorrect anomaly. r=0.435 is very much not a strong correlation, but it’s not zero either, especially with a sample size this enormous.

  • Zkuld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    183
    ·
    13 hours ago

    For your sins of axis-cropping, you shall be redeemed by reciting the periodic table thrice.

    • bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The only redemption is re-posting the full, properly cropped picture!

      • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The image showing that less testosterone correlates to a higher IQ. from 800ng/dl of testosterone at an IQ of 40 to less than 400ng/dl at an IQ of 160. One exceptional individual has an IQ of above 150 with a testosterone measurement of above 1600ng/dl.

        • Zerush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          9 hours ago

          • ErevanDB@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Shift the zone downwards quite a bit to be more accurate. Not many of them are high testosterone.

            • Zerush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              41 minutes ago

              Well, there are a lot of rednecks with a circular family tree an more brain in their balls as in their head.

        • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Now, I can find where I’d probably project to be.

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science_memes@mander.xyz

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

  • !spiders@lemmy.world

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • !academia@mander.xyz
  • !science@mander.xyz
  • !scicomm@mander.xyz

Biology and Life Sciences

  • !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
  • !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
  • !anthropology@mander.xyz
  • !arachnology@mander.xyz
  • !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
  • !biodiversity@mander.xyz
  • !biology@mander.xyz
  • !biophysics@mander.xyz
  • !botany@mander.xyz
  • !ecology@mander.xyz
  • !entomology@mander.xyz
  • !fermentation@mander.xyz
  • !herpetology@mander.xyz
  • !houseplants@mander.xyz
  • !medicine@mander.xyz
  • !microscopy@mander.xyz
  • !mycology@mander.xyz
  • !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
  • !nutrition@mander.xyz
  • !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
  • !palaeontology@mander.xyz
  • !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
  • !plantid@mander.xyz
  • !plants@mander.xyz
  • !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz

Physical Sciences

  • !astronomy@mander.xyz
  • !chemistry@mander.xyz
  • !earthscience@mander.xyz
  • !geography@mander.xyz
  • !geospatial@mander.xyz
  • !nuclear@mander.xyz
  • !physics@mander.xyz
  • !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
  • !spectroscopy@mander.xyz

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • !archaeology@mander.xyz
  • !folklore@mander.xyz
  • !history@mander.xyz
  • !old_maps@mander.xyz

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
  • !gardening@mander.xyz
  • !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
  • !soilscience@slrpnk.net
  • !terrariums@mander.xyz
  • !timelapse@mander.xyz

Memes

  • !bushrat_confidential@slrpnk.net
  • !science_memes@mander.xyz

Miscellaneous

  • !answered@mander.xyz
  • !mander@mander.xyz
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.76K users / day
  • 5.06K users / week
  • 9.32K users / month
  • 19.2K users / 6 months
  • 98 local subscribers
  • 20.6K subscribers
  • 7.49K Posts
  • 205K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • SciBot@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org