• @Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    126 hours ago

    Watch the Netflix documentary about the Three Mile Island accident. Yeah, fuck that shit and keep it shutdown until maximizing profits becomes a lower priority than safety.

  • peopleproblems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    779 hours ago

    No, see that is explicitly not what I agreed with before.

    Microsoft buys the plant and Microsoft pays start and maintenance cost.

    If it will privately benefit Microsoft they can privately fund it.

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      158 hours ago

      Amazing how first headline was about microsbit needing this…

      Now owner needs state aid to provide electric for microshit AI

      Ain’t free market capitalism great, wage slaves

      U pay for everything

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          17 hours ago

          indeed but i like to get a rise out of Corpo Democrats (bootlickers) and right wingers (which we really don’t get around here much)

    • @sunbeam60
      link
      English
      15 hours ago

      They are seeking a LOAN.

      • @T00l_shed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 hours ago

        They don’t need a LOAN, they can pay out of POCKET. Also if it DEFAULTS the TAX PAYERS will end up footing the BILL. How much MONEY will MS make off of this? Will they take care of clean up if something bad happens? If it’s a federal loan who provides the money off the bat?

      • umami_wasabi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Think what happen M$ decided to scrap the new data center, or straight up not buying power from the plant? What if the plant can’t make a profit? Who is going to pay when it defaults? What if there’s a slip up and end up the next Chernobyl? Of course, it’s taxpayer who pay all.

    • Brokkr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Market cap doesn’t say how much cash they have available. For that, look at cash on hand which publicaly traded companies need to report

      MS has about 75B cash on hand, so they could afford this themselves. They will probably argue that it will bring jobs and expertise to the state. Also, it’s a loan, so the interest will generate funding for the state as well. nevermind, not a loan from the state, so no interest would go to the state.

      • Repple (she/her)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2610 hours ago

        You’re right that it doesn’t mean cash on hand, but it does indicate they could liquidate some of that or borrow against it themselves.

        • Sentient Loom
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3310 hours ago

          Yeah Microsoft should take the risk here, not American citizens.

          • @BertramDitore@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            Bingo. They should invest in their own company, they have the money. There’s no reason for taxpayers to play any part in this.

            • sunzu2
              link
              fedilink
              68 hours ago

              Why when they can get stupid peasants to pay for it?

                • sunzu2
                  link
                  fedilink
                  16 hours ago

                  If people quit larping propaganda and followed the dollar from it being earned into their pocket to going back into the employer’s pocket… it would a different society.

    • FiveMacs
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2411 hours ago

      Agreed, but they will still get it regardless but get fucked if you want healthcare.

  • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2810 hours ago

    Ok, so a business loan, no big deal. Oh … what’s this?

    If Constellation received a federal loan guarantee, much of the risk attached to the project would be shifted to taxpayers in the event of a default. It also would reduce the borrowing costs needed to finance to the restart. The project still needs to obtain regulatory approvals to move forward and would require intensive safety oversight during and after the restart.

    Well that doesn’t sound good, I would like some reassurance. Constellation, what say you?

    “Rest assured that to the extent we may seek a loan, Constellation will guarantee full repayment,” the company’s statement said. “Any notion that taxpayers are taking on risk here is fanciful given that any loan will be backstopped by Constellation’s entire $80-billion-plus value.”

    Ah good. A company that for sure is going to hold to its word and not shaft the state or tax payers. Great!

    Due to the age of the plant, some experts have cautioned that the project may require significant investments in refurbishments and maintenance beyond the period of the restart.

    “The $1.6 billion is just the start,” Mark Jacobson, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford University, told the New Republic. “Microsoft will be asking for government handouts just like most all other aged nuclear reactor owners have asked in multiple states.”

    Super, a for profit company worth 3.11 trillion USD (as of 1:25pm EDT) that just needs government handouts for it’s business based on choices it has made to further its own worth. That sounds great, I’m sure taxpayers will get a return on that investment right? Right??

    In September, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro touted thousands of energy jobs that will be created by Constellation’s plans at Three Mile Island. Constellation, which plans to rename the facility the Crane Clean Energy Center, has claimed it will generate about $3 billion in state and federal tax revenue.

    OK, so $3 billion minus $1.6 billion equals $1.4 billion, minus whatever Microsoft gets as a handout (likely equal to or more than $1.6 billion) equals potential negative billions? Yay capitalism! I’m so happy that the US is willing to help small businesses like this.

  • @chaospatterns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    While I’m not a fan of the loan nor the massive waste of power most LLMs are, I actually think that’s its a good thing because if Microsoft can break through some of the excessive red tape on nuclear plants then they’ll bring this online and hopefully prove that nuclear power can be safe and a good source of large amounts of power, when the huge demand for AI dies down, then maybe they’ll keep the plant around and provide power to the grid.

    • MaggiWuerze
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 minutes ago

      when the huge demand for AI dies down, then maybe they’ll keep the plant around and provide power to the grid. they’ll abandon it to cut costs leaving the government to mop up after them as they always do

      FTFY

  • Sentient Loom
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1310 hours ago

    So let Microsoft pay to restart it.

    I guess it the government gives them the loan then the gov’t gets interest payments, which must help inflation over time. Assuming that they make those payments…

  • @yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    710 hours ago

    OK, the Utility is getting a loan against expected future payments by Microsoft. So, if all goes to plan, MICROSOFT IS PAYING FOR THIS!

    • @reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      If Microsoft is paying for it, why do they need a loan?

      Will Microsoft also be paying for any nuclear waste disposal?

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        28 hours ago

        To ask is to answer…

        Deny corpo parasite state aid!

  • @tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    411 hours ago

    considers

    If it gets a federal subsidy, that subsidy is going to really primarily benefit Pennsylvania, yes?

    I mean, yes, power from it maybe – if Microsoft isn’t schlorping all of it up – help support the grid in the region a bit. But if Microsoft’s building a datacenter in Pennsylvania and this is subsidizing a nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania, the benefit’s really principally going to Pennsylvania alone, other than in the limited sense that it reduces carbon dioxide emissions.

    California or Nevada, say, isn’t going to benefit from that either way.

    Like, if there’s some sort of federal subsidy accessible to any state that wants to do nuclear power build-out and that this is just how Pennsylvania chooses to make use of it, that might be one thing.