• PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    36 minutes ago

    Call a lawyer and give a deposition before they can do anything. Collect as much information as possible. Dump all of the cars and electronics that I own, ship my active phone to a different state. Stop using credit cards. Strap up. Send my family to day with various people who I know who are Leo or retired Leo or retired military. Always wear a hat, mask, etc. have a different lawyer set up an LLC without my name attached and use that to register a van to stay in with a business name on the side. Avoid big retailers who use facial recognition. Park the van near my old bosses houses during the day since it looks like a plumbing truck or whatever and sleep during the day since they think I would be hiding somewhere far away. If they see me then they would be shitting themselves. Go to their house when only their spouse or kids are home pretending to be a service person and get pictures inside their house. Send them photos of them and their family leaving and coming home at their school, their wifi ssid, inside of their house, house plans from the county, etc. from a different zip code far away by using a mail forwarding service so they think I’ve skipped town but I’m actually right there.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    No busy roads, no flights with very few onboard, no views from balconies or other such places like large hotel windows. Cook everything yourself and you’ll be alright!

  • LordGimp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Apparently you just have to kill a ceo in public and dozens of cops will come make sure you don’t get suicided before the state does it.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I wonder if giving the information to the coporations competitor (as anonymously as possible of course) would do anything good? Try to turn the corps against eachother. At least you would know if they are secretly in league if the competitor doesnt expose them.

    Also, i think anyone who is in position to do something like this should try to find more like minded people and continue as a group. Even then its dangerous but much less so than alone since there are more people to help. You wouldnt resist enemy occupation alone and expect to live long either.

    • wetsoggybread@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      This likely wouldnt work because that corporation could get in trouble for corporate espianoge. Some guy reportedly stole the recipe for cococola and tried to sell it to pepsi and they ratted him out

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Human beings are fragile creatures. Big corps generally don’t need to make the big effort of a murder and a cover-up when they can almost completely legally harass people into taking their own lives.

    To that end? Get a good therapist and a psych. Preferably not on workplace insurance, if such a thing is feasible for the situation.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Collect all your evidence into one large archive, upload it somewhere and make it known that if you die of anything other than natural causes, that information will become available to EVERYONE.

    Read up on how “dead man’s switches” work. If you don’t send a signal online, log into a particular account on a regular basis, that sends the release signal.

    • Aa!@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      23 hours ago

      But why bother holding back in the first place. If this is whistleblower information like Boeing safety issues, there’s no point in setting up a dead man’s switch. You want to release it all immediately in the first place, because keeping it to yourself undermines the point of blowing the whistle

      • InputZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Then the incentive becomes to stop a whistleblower faster if they had a dead-man cache than if they released it all at once. There’s no guarantee that the whistleblower is being honest or is capable enough to undertake something like that but there’s always a risk that the whistleblower may disclose that information anyway. Better to stop the whistleblower by arresting them first and deal with the potential fallout than negotiate. Now the whistleblower’s reputation is ruined, if they’re behind bars they’re effectively silenced, and they’re as good as dead to society without all that messy work trying to fake a suicide.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Man, lots of crazy, unrealistic advice here.

    One person literally said to live in a motel. No, do not live alone.

    The answer is pretty simple, live in a community house with like 8 other people.

  • Overboard8171@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    Don’t leak. Spread seldom rumours online about the company with plausible deniability. Find a crazy-er person and/or group. Continue spreading dots. Spread info to Youtubers. Others with a platform. Use a VM, a password manager inside the VM. After 12 months, delete all your credentials and the VM. The system can not protect you. Corps rule democracy. Don’t trust the system. Spread the info until it reaches critical mass or the faith in the system collapses. Your life is worth more than some righteous leak. See the Pentagon Papers life. He lived a very humble life afterwards.

    NOTE: method untested and invented just now.

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      wouldnt it just drown with all the insane crap the crackpots spew anyway and become tainted by association with them? But yeah, you definitely shouldnt use your own name and should spread the leak all over.

  • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Despite all precautions, if you are one of the few persons whose circumstances could allow the leak, then they’ll narrow it down to you. Especially if you were the reluctant one, the one that raised ethical issues etc…

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Do

    • Live on cash from different ATMs;
    • Stay at a hotel/motel that changes weekly;
    • Rent a car and change it at different rental locations every week;
    • Communicate only with your lawyer;
    • Record everything in an official manner as soon as possible.
    • Stay offline
    • Get a dumb phone, and if you must have a computer get a new laptop with no wifi or mobile data hardware;

    Do Not

    • Go anywhere you don’t need to go;
    • Tell anyone where you are;
    • Go to the middle of nowhere, this reduces your escape routes unless you’re Bear Grylls;
    • Confront anyone, they can have you arrested and prison violence makes their job much easier;
    • Go to the news without your lawyer;
    • Use a smartphone, or any device that was yours before and is capable of connecting online;

    And most of all don’t listen to the billy badasses in here. If a multi billion dollar corporation wants you dead and is willing to break the law they can afford a lot of very nasty people. You aren’t getting the tactical training to stand against them in that short amount of time, that takes years and dedication and even then you’ll be learning how to run away in a deadly manner. Your best defense is to be ghost except when you show up for court dates and depositions. That’s what the Secret Service Witness Protection Program does and it works if you have discipline.

  • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    how’d you find the guy?

    Easy. We had a list of the fifteen or so guys that did that specific part of the job, we got their IP addresses, watched them for a while, and as it turns out, two of them regularly use a VPN and send all of their traffic to Canada.

    How long do you think it would take to figure out whether or not which one of these boys are harmless software pirates, or their man?

    People do all of the work in the world without knowing that your preparation will blow your cover.

    Have you ever visited TailsOS’s website off of a VPN? Could the Feds find out? Do you think the other guys have the same level of deniability?

    That trail is not washing off. You even knowing or having a history of using a Linux iso is suspicion enough if the rest of the suspects are all boring chuds.

      • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        Not even, it’s just comparing you to the average joe.

        Who’s more suspicious? The dude who visits GitHub, has a Matrix account and visits the arch wiki every six months or the dude who mostly sticks to Facebook talking to his family?

        FBI: …I don’t see anything

        Yeah right.

    • Amanduh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Is this some leet hacker fantasy where you are persecuted for using Linux? Lemmy you never disappoint lmao

      • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Shit take but ok.

        If you want to feel inferior for not using Linux, there’s plenty of boards for that.

        Hell, I’ll make you feel inferior right now if you like. How many comments do you want? I’ll go grab my tech meme folder and we can /g/ this place up.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    232
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Take the advice offered by journalists on how to contact them privately and avoid getting caught. I.e. secure and protect evidence without raising suspicion. Contact a reputable journalist via some secure means of communication. Let them take over and keep silent. Don’t brag or something.

    Most good newspapers offer something like PGP encrypted mail, SecureDrop over TOR and more to talk to them.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      175
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      This children is why the need for private communication isn’t something you can laugh away by claiming you have nothing to hide.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        2 days ago

        Absolutely. There are many reasons, but attacks on journalists/whistleblowers and the malicious potential of collated data in a capitalist oligarchy are the first two that come to mind.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      Encrypt email with anyone who publishes a key. If “bad” emails are the only ones you encrypt, then that metadata can be used to raise suspicion of you and to trace your contacts.

  • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 day ago

    While it won’t help you getting suicided, setting up a deadman’s switch on the cloud that will release your testimony is definitely worth doing.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      Additionally, give a copy of all the documents to your lawyer to release in the case of your death. Multiple Deadman switches are better than one, especially one that’s controlled by a person and not just hoping your cloud service doesn’t go down after you’re dead.

    • Aa!@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      With whistleblower information, why hold it back in the first place? Wouldn’t it be better to release it immediately if they might kill you either way?

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        IIRC the problem there is that it potentially makes you liable to be sued by the company for disclosing negative/private information. But they can’t exactly hold you liable if you’re dead, so if you’re dead you may as well speak what you know from beyond the grave.