• Boo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    225
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’d be willing to linearly downscale.

    I am sure that for me 3 Million is more than i could ever reasonably spend for the rest of my life.

    So with 8760 hours in a year, that would be like 53 Minutes. You know what, make it a full hour.

    • HyonoKo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      159
      ·
      9 days ago

      This comment exposes how wrong it actually is, that we allow individuals to become billionaires…

    • Avicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Came here to say that. 30 billion is a stupid amount of money. If down scaling is an option, anyone who considers doing it for a year (for personally owning all the money) is mentally ill.

      • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        9 days ago

        Why?

        Shouldn’t everyone feel morally responsible for receiving the maximum reward so that they can personally distribute those funds amongst as many people as possible? The other guy is fine with just 3m, so one year of your life apparently could provide 9999 other people with a life of never having to work again.

    • NKBTN@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah I wouldn’t know what to do with 30 billion. Pay off the mortgage, couple of new cars, irrigate the world’s deserts?

    • Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Fair. Though I think if I had 30 billion I’d start build better housing in 3rd world countries or something like that

  • SurfinBird@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    148
    ·
    9 days ago

    Of all the ways to get 30 billion dollars, this would probably be the least emotionally disturbing choice.

  • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    9 days ago

    I think this is one of those things where it seems totally fine to you but in reality it activates some kind of intrinsic biological limit that you aren’t even aware of. I FEEL like I would easily conquer the nothing box by just doing a lot of great thinking. But scientifically, I kind of doubt that I really could. It’s like if someone challenged me to eat only celery for a year. I might have the willpower to do it, but biologically I may just die. Now I don’t think the nothing box would kill me, but I can imagine it making people go crazy for sure.

    • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      9 days ago

      solitary confinement is recognized as torture, and that’s probably for a good reason. I’ve also had personal experience in psychiatric hospitals with people who had to be confined, and while their being there is probably due to every available professional being entirely hopeless with them, the confinement definitely doesn’t help the situation. even the ex-director of the NIMH, thomas insel, finds in “healing: our path from mental illness to mental health” that a lot of mental healthcare is actually social and communal care, not cold hard medicine. where medicines fail, you can still treat a patient with kindness and patience, integrate them into their community, make friends, have good daily experiences. you can still give them a human touch. all that heals people to some extent, and solitary confinement is exactly the opposite of it.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Id still do it in a heartbeat. I’ve got a year to lay there and plan out how to best distribute/use it. $30 billion would be more than enough to build a nice commune that can grow someplace with healthcare and everything else taken care of for all the people that live there. Just the interest would pay for everything if you could get 5% interest on it and never have to touch any of the principle. Could get 15,000 people going and pay them all 100,000 a year at first while we set everything up. There would be a lot of schematics to figure out, and finding a location would be tough, but there is absolutely no reason I couldn’t go to therapy or even get others to help manage the set up and walk into the sea after if I’ve really lost it. Could possibly help a lot of people and grow into something nice.

      • fartographer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        That’s exactly the point. The idea that $100 is an amount of money that would give most people some pause before they spend it, but it’s not an unmanageable amount of money.

        So, how about we’re try counting to 30 billion by hundreds. Even then, it’s a ridiculous task. If you decided to purchase every single thing (that exists) that you’ve ever wanted, you’d go insane just trying to figure out why anyone would ever need that much money.

        Then again, you could not spend it on yourself… then, it becomes super-easy to spend billions of dollars! You could lift entire starving populations into solvency. So, why is no one doing that? Cuz the coolest thing to do with billions of dollars is to build more portfolios and buy politicians.

        Let’s think about this another way: I don’t know how much it costs to hire a hitman, but I feel like $10,000 is a pretty common amount to read in articles about successful hits (followed by arrests). So, assuming $10k is a reasonable price for a hit, $30B is enough to put out hits on almost every single person in USA. People like Musk could afford to hire hitmen to wipe out populations across entire countries, and I’m sure he’s thought about that plenty of times. It’s no wonder he can build self-crashing cars with no remorse. Dude can literally get away with murder, and then afford to murder anyone who tries to arrest or prosecute him.

        I’d rather go insane trying to count to 30 billion than to suffer from whatever brain-rot is going on in the minds of existing billionaires.

    • Seefoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      ironically, I doubt you could count to 30 billion in 1 year…shows how much money that is.

      • SparroHawc@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Once you get into the millions, it takes well over a second to recite each digit of a number. One million is only 1/30,000th of the way in.

        A year is less than 32 million seconds.

        Even if you skipped to 1 million, and somehow managed to get through each number in only a second, and counted every single second of every single day without breaking for sleep, you still would only get a little over a thousandth of the way through 30 billion.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    1 year and your insane

    Or

    Waste your whole life working towards 0.001% of that.

    If I can write a will beforehand for who gets it then it’s worth it.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’ve seen VSauce’s video where Michael does this for like, what, three days? And he’s basically lost it by the end. So while this is tempting, no, I can’t do it.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 days ago

    I like that Lemmy’s first thought is pro-rated payments, and yes, it really does show how much money 30 billion is when you can make millions in an hour. My first thought was, I think I could actually pull out off for the full year.

    Most people need some kind of social interaction, including folks with conditions that make that hard. I’m probably not an exception to that but I have learned ways to pass full days of time just story developing and singing and such. Creating characters also helps ward the loneliness, although I think the hardest part is being unable to actually write anything down. I could easily do a year if I had enough paper and a way to draw or write.

  • WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    i mean, a year is absurd, and that amount of money is meaningless.

    how about i just stay in for a day and get 82million instead

    • BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      vsauce did something like this for 3 days and he nearly lost his mind. i think 2 days max is all us regular people can do

    • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Yeah, the arbitrary cash amounts in these would you memes are always a little goofy, as if the creator thinks 30-billion is so high that anyone seeing it will start screaming “YAAASSSS GIRL!!” no matter what the challenge. 100-million would be just as effective to the average person. Maybe even 10-million if your wealth aspirations are not to buy a golden palace with twelve Lamborghinis and a rocket pad.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m with you. A day or two at most is all I would need to be set for life for anything I would ever want.

      I like fancy tech, so I might stick around for a second or third day because fancy tech isn’t cheap.

      People in my field refer to it as “backing up the money dump truck to (vendor) HQ” … Just to give some context.

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        how insidious a trap, thinking like that. you may find yourself stuck there for the year after all! /s

  • HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 days ago

    If I survived the year, then spent the next year with $500k worth of therapy to become semi-normalish again, I’m still left with $29.9995 billion dollars. Hell yeah I’ll do it.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 days ago

    If I were to do something so ridiculous for a full year for the full amount, I wouldn’t be doing it for me. There’s no way I would be able to spend 10Bn in my lifetime on things for me and my immediate family. I don’t think that’s even possible unless we were literally flushing money down the toilet, burning it, or throwing pallets of $100s from a plane while flying over a populated area.

    I would use the 10Bn to create things like scholarship funds for colleges, where the only requirement is that you can prove you don’t come from money (and can afford whatever education you want without help).

    I would also be donating large amounts to charities and good causes, especially FOSS and things like the Internet archive.

    Above and beyond that, I’d likely use my newfound wealth to create a company that builds open source or modular hardware for things currently dominated by big tech. Like mobile phones, specifically Android phones, and supporting companies doing similar work like framework.

    I would only take enough to pay off my house, all debts, and for a savings/income fund so that I can live comfortably for the rest of my life without needing to work, both for myself, my spouse, and some members of my immediate family.

    While in the box, I would let me ADHD brain wander endlessly and entertain itself, until it gets bored or tired, then sleep and repeat that 365 times.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      Exactly my thinking. For $30 billion I don’t care if I come out the other side a mindless husk. I’m leaving instructions before I go in about what to do with the money and improving as many lives as I can.

      If I make it out with enough of my mind to enjoy some of it myself then that’s just gravy.

  • dave@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 days ago

    The reports on the linked wiki page of the use of things like this as torture aside, is there any research / evidence on how things like this affect people who are treated this way voluntarily?

    I’ve seen video of someone volunteering to be waterboarded to show that it’s not that bad if you know what’s happening (spoiler—it was still very bad). I’d assume other kinds of psychological torture would be just as hard to deal with, even with full knowledge and consent.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      9 days ago

      vsauce of all people did a thing on this sort of voluntary sensory deprivation in their series mind field back in 2017. results were not good. michael spent i think three days in a white room with a bed and a box of food, and he was a wreck when he was let out. the loss of any sense of time really fucks with you apparently.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’ve seen video of someone volunteering to be waterboarded to show that it’s not that bad if you know what’s happening (spoiler—it was still very bad)

      Ah yes, renowned edgelord and one of the Four Horsemen of Atheism, Christopher Hitchens

      https://youtu.be/4LPubUCJv58?t=194

      • Tingle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        To be fair to him, he didn’t think it would be that bad, said as much then tried it. Afterwards he completely changed his point of view and admitted he was wrong.

        • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          sure, he changed his view on that particular thing and that was noble. But him and the other three are arseholes because of the aggressive way they behave(d) towards religious people.

          The point of secularism is to allow people to have their faith or lack therof, and have public life not assume one way is correct. They weren’t “atheist figures” they were anti-theistic crusaders, who gave a hand to islamophobes during a time of increased islamophobia during the “war on terror” which laid the foundation of the civil liberties abuses happening today.