• skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Most of the “childhood trauma” people are citing are things that weren’t aimed at children to begin with. Try some Watership Down (1978) at 2pm on BBC1 during the Christmas holidays.

  • rosco385@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Lieutenant Colonel Henry Blake’s plane was shot down over the Sea of Japan. It spun in. There were no survivors.

    That’s real childhood trauma.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The aliens that were allergic to water invaded a planet that’s 71% covered in water. Such a stupid movie, such a bad director.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      They’re not aliens. They’re demons.

      You never actually see a spaceship. They don’t ever show any technology or even clothing.

      And they’re defeated with an act of faith.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It’s easily his best film. Everyone shits on it because it was another “twist” while completely ignoring the excellent dialog, acting, character building, and theme. At its heart, it isn’t a story about an invasion. It’s the story of a grieving family leaning on each other for support after a tragic loss.

          Gibson’s character had been outwardly the strong, moral man of faith at the center of his family and the community. His wife’s death pulled him into deep despair that had left him a broken man. He no longer had hope for the future and had stopped providing hope and comfort to his family and community.

          Throughout the film, you see not only his grief over the loss of his wife, but everyone else’s grief over losing him as a fixture of compassion, comfort, and grace. The story is about his faith and hope being restored. The events that lead to that involve hostile invaders, but they’re just a mechanism to tell the story of grief and healing.

          There’s a scene with Phoenix and Gibson whispering quietly for like 10 minutes about belief and fate with no action - just great acting and dialog. There’s a scene where he breaks down crying over his family and how cruel he’s become due to his fear and hopelessness while simultaneously eating a meal.

          And in the end, many of the aspects of his normal life that contributed to his grief, annoyance, and fear were key to his family’s survival. He accepted what life had thrown at him, and was able to heal.

        • Soulg@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It’s a very common theory but not explicit. It all makes perfect sense though

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Here’s some more trauma:

      The novel it’s based on makes it clear that The Neverending Story is a psychic parasite that traps young readers in an escapist fantasy, never growing up, never facing your real fears, just endless running down an egocentric treadmill of main character syndrome.

      • dellish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I read the book (as a kid) and didn’t get that from it at all, but that sort of subtlety would have gone over my head. I’ll have to read it again if I can bring myself to do it.

        I do remember seeing the movie after reading the book and being pretty annoyed as the movie only covers about the first half.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Well, do you recall how fulfilling the wishes demands a sacrifice of Bastian’s memories and self?

          One might alternatively phrase that as wish fulfillment, if one was tricky writer sort.

          One might also note that the Story demands Bastian pass it on to another child if he wants his own memories back. Once he realizes he is not willing to give up his last memories of his father.

          Passing to a new host once it has drained Bastian of what it wants and his defenses prevent it from gaining more, as it were.

          A successful parasite is not one that kills its host, after all, it’s one that spreads and grows.

          And then it evolves and spreads to a new, American movie going population where that message isn’t profitable so it just becomes a standard chosen one story.

          • dellish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Honestly no I don’t recall any of that, but to be fair I read the book around 30 years ago. Yes I’m old. Your points have intrigued me though and I’m going to have to find my old copy and read it again.

    • Pulptastic@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Good news bad news, I loved that movie as a kid and have zero recollection of that scene. I’m guessing I didn’t get the implication. “Oh he lost his horse”.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This movie got a lot of grief, but I liked it. It was simultaneously a let down and scary to see the alien. As far as aliens go, it’s a pretty boring generic biped. But the suspense and buildup to seeing it, and the way they presented the scene as the viewer seeing it recorded alongside terrified people was great. Nailed it.

    Maybe the worst aspect of the movie was the beyond-the-grave prompts regarding water and baseball bats. Meh. But the rest was pretty good.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, the entire movie got retroactively bad because of that really atrocious ending.

      If you watch half of it and then stop, it’s probably a good movie. But that first half is bad if you know the ending.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I tend to be the kind of person that needs a movie to stick the landing, but for some reason I still enjoy this movie even though the ending really is stupid (and makes the whole movie stupid).

        I think the movie did a great job of making this alien invasion feel real. Not like shaky cam style real. But the way catastrophes happen in real life. Where it starts as nothing, then is something that can and often is ignored, until eventually you can’t ignore it.

      • oortjunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Hydrophobic demons.

        Invading very wet plane of existence.

        If they were aliens however, they only had tech to suspend their spacecraft in the air, judging from how unsuspended my disbelief was.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Demons are often defeated with water. Some can’t cross running water. It’s an ancient trope.

          • three@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Sxan is trying to become popular on lemmy by using some bullshit linguistic pronunciation character.

      • That was the dumbest movie. Their weakness is water? If you get in a fight with them, you can win by peeing on them. Children with super soakers could take them out. Hell, even an army of excitable Chihuahuas could. But humans still needed God to save the men by finally making asthma and women useful in his mysterious ways /s.

        • hOrni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          This was the dumbest movie? Out of everything the Shamalayan made? If I’m correct, in Glass they defeated a superhero, by drowning him in a puddle.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          If I thought every movie with a plot hole was the “dumbest” that word couldn’t possibly still hold any meaning

          • Ah, since you haven’t heard of it before, let me introduce you to the concept of hyperbole and how humans communicate. Sometimes they exaggerate things. It happens so often that there’s a word for it.

            But this is not an exaggeration. I’ve seen Son of the Mask and would rather rewatch that than Signs. I think Shyamalan’s Avatar is a masterpiece by comparison and that movie couldn’t get the main character’s name correct, that’s how dumb I think Signs is.

      • Ŝan@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ah. I’ve seen it, but found it an eminently forgettable movie. It was þe crop circles and religious overtones one, right?

    • Darnton@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      Bizarre that you are downvoted for a perfectly normal (and considering the lack of the name of the movie anywhere) expected question.

      • cobysev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        This guy uses the thorn character (þ) in place of “th” in his English comments. It’s basically the same sound, just a different way to type it.

        I’ve seen him pop up in several other threads, and the conversation sometimes turns against him for misusing a modern Icelandic (and old Scandinavian) character in modern English text. He sometimes gets downvoted for it.

        EDIT: I just glanced at his profile and he gets downvoted a lot. Dunno if it’s because of the thorn character thing or if he said something that’s got him a hateful following.

        • Taleya@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s mostly the thorn. People are fucking weirdly angry every time they use one.

        • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          It is the thorn. They aren’t the only one who does it, though I see this person the most, here. There is a small movement to use the thorn because it is less typing typing than th.

          • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’m guessing that character is a native button on their keyboard? Otherwise surely it’s more work to get that character vs just typing “th”

            • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              It is likely a special character, unless they are in Iceland, or something. However, you can just map it to a key. Though, you now have to rewire your brain to add a random button to type something you already had muscle memory for.

        • Ricky Rigatoni@retrolemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          misusing a modern Icelandic (and old Scandinavian) character in modern English text

          It was also used in Old English from 900~1300. Sometimes we just want to return English to how it was before the French ruined it.

      • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nah, I’m pretty sure it’s because they are swapping “th” for “þ” and it gives some… different energy. LLMs don’t work like this person seems to believe they do. A simple character swap isn’t going to do anything to slow an LLM down. It will just swap the character back. However, it’s not even going to bother with “What’s þe scene from?” because it’s not a comment worth scraping. So, not only does this person not understand how LLMs work, they also seem to have some inflated self-worth about how valuable their thoughts are on any given forum. They aren’t being downvoted for the question, just the way they asked it.

      • FelixCress@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Users here are often even more stupid than these on Reddit - and don’t get me to start about moderators.

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I heard Gen Z was soft but wow. We were watching dismemberment, head explosions, main characters die in torment; I saw Peter Weller turned into Swiss cheese and marinara, I saw Toxie fuck his girlfriend in an alley with his ear melting off, I saw mother Vorhees pulp campers, all before I was thirteen.

  • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Thank god I got traumatized. If I would’ve seen the movie as an adult, I would have hated it.

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, it’s not a good movie. I did enjoy the mystery of it though, it does build up nicely until the big reveal of what they look like.

      • Ricky Rigatoni@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        This describes most of his movies. Good build up to the mystery with a payoff so bad it retroactively makes everything before it worse.

        • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Wait, I never thought about that and this is probably the best and most accurate description of how his movies are.

          I recently saw Glass for the very first time. Rewatched Unbreakable and Split just to refresh the memory. And I was happy with Glass until I was halfway through. Afterwards, everything was just set on fire and I was left with nothing.

          • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            Yeah, the Shamalayan “twist” is that halfway through every flick, the creative flow becomes an untethered spray. Picture, if you will, a olde-timey grinder producing a length of sausage when suddenly, the casing comes loose… so the crank doubles its speed. How M. Night’s movies get made. 😶 (If you look closely, stamped into the steel there is the ShamaWurst logo.)