Less negligence and more malice. The gun has been fired at that point. It’s provable.
Apparently they forgot about the multiple people filming them from different angles but habits die hard
Fascists do not care about the video evidence, they will just outright lie and yell “but the gun was fired!” and then it’s on you to explain at length that the gun was fired after it had already been taken away.
You think he intentionally shot it into the ground to set everyone off?
And to fabricate evidence of why it was “necessary” to magdump on a random citizen. I wouldn’t put it past them. They don’t deserve the benefit of the doubt that they got spooked by an accidental discharge tbh.
I think what he was suggesting is it muddies the evidence. If the gun wasn’t fired, that’s proof that it wasn’t ever used against them. If it was fired at some point, then the pigs can claim he fired it at them and there’s no way to prove otherwise.
You know, except all the recordings.
that’s would not surprise me in the slightest
A “starter pistol” for the pig racing - maintaining a degree of legal cover for the initial “accidental” shot, but letting them all have their fun.
Or claim to have been set off by the shot after
I would be willing to give benefit of the doubt that it was panic shooting brought on by a negligent discharge if not for the fact the shooting cop used his arm to quite calmly move all the other cops out of the way so he could light up the guy.
Maybe Im built different but if I were spooked by an accidental discharge of a gun my first thought would be to drop down, assuming I’m being shot at by ANYONE OTHER THAN THE UNARMED GUY BEING MOBBED BY 5 PEOPLE, rather than to immediately shoot that guy 27 times
It’s a Sig P320, so there’s always the possibility it’s an uncommanded discharge, they just do that sometimes, especially when being holstered and unholstered (such as when or shortly after Pretti was forcibly disarmed, a law enforcement agent unholstered Pretti’s gun before other agents shot and killed him while he was unarmed)
If Pretti’s P320 did actually did discharge without a trigger pull, surely that must be it for this gun at least, and I don’t see how Sig Sauer could live this down. But that’s a big if, it’s always possible that the agent was negligent and pulled the trigger or that the gun wasn’t discharged.
What if we push that narrative on Twitter? Sig’s lawyers come out to defend it as they do, and through the process they use their money and influence to disclose all the shit the feds are trying to bury?..
Could work, wonder what the chud reaction would be, would they say that Sig Sauer is woke, or something else?
@MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net posted about the possibility that the gun ICE took from him really went off without any trigger pulling. Seemingly this happens more often with this gun.
