• darthelmet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    and think Helen Keller wasn’t real

    wat? I’m not on any dating apps, is this a real conspiracy theory people believe?

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      there are many many more conspiracy theories out there that people believe than there is time for you to learn about all of them.

  • httperrorcode@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    dating app companies have different incentives than you, and you cant afford to pay them enough to align the two. I think this is inevitable and it always greatly surprises me when people actually find love over these apps

  • Leviathan@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I met a handful of people on dating apps, had some sex, and the relationships went basically nowhere. Every solid, long-term relationship I have had has come from going places and doing things with people. If I was single I’d start climbing again.

    • 87Six@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Fun fact: you can probably guess the ethnicity of Spencer Rascoff, the CEO of Match Group.

    • cannedtuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      8 days ago

      Good lord they own basically all the major ones.

      Also all the different “X People Meet” apps, but no Linux People Meet? 😭 /s

      • pmk@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        8 days ago

        I met my girlfriend on IRC, we’ve been living together for 7 years now. She was trolling people with goatse pics and we started talking about philosophy and poetry etc and then it turned out that she’s a super cute canadian girl. This is usually not the story we tell people when they ask how we met.

        • Axolotl@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          That’s the most crazy story i have read and the best one probably

          Also, THIS is how you are supposed to meet people online not with dating apps, dating apps just suck and make you choose the most sexy “option” and maybe their interests maybe

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 days ago

          Holy shit, I didn’t think that was even possible. I can’t let myself start thinking that’s a possibility, I just can’t. That could lead to disaster.

          • pmk@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            You’d never guess if you just met her, she’s a 5’2 ballet dancer but she knows everything about various serial killers. People are complex, we have many sides.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          This is usually not the story we tell people when they ask how we met.

          Honestly, it’s a way better story than telling people you met on a dating app. And the ones that would be weirded out by the story are probably not people you’d want to spend a lot of time around

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        Also all the different “X People Meet” apps, but no Linux People Meet? 😭 /s

        Tbh, isn’t that just Alovoa? I had never heard of it until I saw it on FDroid

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 days ago

      How is that not an anti-trust issue? Each one started as an independent company trying to add value by bringing something new to the table, and they bought them all up to eliminate the competition and enshittified them all with the same profit-gouging algorithms.

      Not to mention the concerted effort they made to make in-person dating a social taboo so that everyone literally depends on the dating apps to find potential partners.

      Back before I gave up on dating, when I was still on reddit, I can’t tell you how many times I heard the same advice. “Don’t approach people in person, nobody wants to be bothered. Just use the apps where you know they want to be approached.”

      That with the systematic minimization of the shittiness of the apps, and the victim blaming “just work on yourself bro, you must be a shit person if you can’t find a partner, so you’d find a partner if you could just stop being a shit person.”

      Looking back, I wonder how much of that was astroturfing by the Match Group marketing department…

      • jtrek@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        How is that not an anti-trust issue?

        Because we live in the bad place. Conservatives are unlikely to pursue anti-trust unless they’re using it as a tool to hurt out-group (eg: they might try to break up an organization they perceive as being too queer).

        We don’t have a strong left in the US. You get glimmers every so often - Lina Khan was trying to do anti-trust work, but then trump returned and that’s all moot.

        A lot of problems would go away or be less bad if we stopped letting power consolidate. Unfortunately, this is the bad place.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yeah, that’s so true. Ironically, anti-trust laws are more often used to help corporate interests maintain their monopolies and duopolies.

          Any time a new startup comes in and threatens to claim a significant portion of the market share, these entrenched big business interests accusing them of “monopolistic practices” even though it’s literally the opposite. It’s plain old DARVO.

          We do not live in a free market. That’s a myth told by the oligarch caste to enable and maintain their corruption, capture, and control of the market.

    • Banana@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      This makes total sense!

      I met my husband on Tinder in 2014, 3 years before consolidation in 2017. When I was using it it was only a joint venture with Match Group

      I also had some success before 2014 on okcupid (initially owned by IAC which used to contain Match Group and has since separated from match group but Match group kept OkCupid) and POF (sold in 2015 to Match Group)

      Makes sense to me why I had a way different experience on dating websites back when I was single compared to my single friends now.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Feeld is there too. Their matching and like system is very much weighted towards paying not-cheap monthly prices.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    8 days ago

    And they’re fake hikers and travelers too. I met somebody irl who said one of their interests was eating food but they just go to the places for the vibes and not for the food. Whereas I’m the complete opposite, I would go to a crack den for the best food.

    • burghler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      8 days ago

      A date I had said their hobbies were walking and hiking among other things. Our 1st date was at a local park with a 20 step stair case that took her out… It was my first exposure to this bizarre labelling that goes on here.

      There wasn’t a 2nd lol

      • terranoid@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        8 days ago

        Humans are just animals at the end of the day. This is all a sexual display of fitness. Hiking and traveling tell people you’re physically and financially fit. You can move around no issue. You are social. You are socially and physically healthy.

        They lie a ton and show pics of hiking from 5 years ago and act like they can still do all that. Or they never could and the pics are deceiving… Regardless, it’s just a game all genders are playing to show sexual fitness. It looks like carbon copies because it’s the best way to communicate “my body moves well and I can afford luxury”.

      • FatVegan@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        I had a firdt date with someone who loved hiking. I asked her if she wanted to go on a trail i like. I was worrued that it was maybe to long and steep, or maybe even to short. When we met, she was way bigger than i expected. I told ger that we could do something else, but she insiated. She was super slow and i was worried sge’s gonna pass out. She asked me if how far we have to go, when i could still see my car. Similar thing happened when i went on a vike ride with someone who was really into cycling

    • iocase@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      The best food is usually in places like that too. My home city has this literal hole in a wall mexican place. You know it’s good when it’s also a grocery store and nobody speaks good English except for the kids who are the wait staff. Best fucking food I’ve ever had and I’m gutted because they closed down 6 months later and I don’t know if they moved or went out of business 😭😭😭

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        amen brother.

        best places to eat are the places with no white people. whitey has no taste.

        but sucks that usually such places don’t last and get replaced with generic white person food.

        • iocase@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          I have a Pavlovian response to seeing shelves of spices and dried peppers in unlabeled bags in a language I can’t read because of this. If I’m already hungry and I walk in to a new place and see that suddenly I’m ravenous.

    • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Ohh a group of my friends has someone like that. Although everyone has been getting increasingly distant from her as she won’t turn up to anything that isn’t fancy enough for her, and there is an increasing feeling that she only ever messages us when she doesn’t have anything else she would rather do going on - we hear from her much more when she is unemployed and single.

  • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    8 days ago

    “Hellen Keller wasn’t real” is an immediate swipe away from a profile. I don’t care if they’re joking or if they’re actually a nut job conspiracy theorist. If the latter, obviously we’re not gonna vibe, and if the former, that entire joke/line of thinking is prefaced on ableism and the idea that a deaf and blind woman could not have accomplished what she did, not to mention the erasure of a prominent socialist, suffragist, and activist. I fucking hate that joke.

      • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        8 days ago

        It started as a joke, and now there are actual people who believe that she was either not a real person, or that her accomplishments were faked. People with disabilities are already assumed to be lesser than able bodied people, and this particular trend is stripping away one of the most prominent examples to the contrary. It is also erasing one of the most prominent examples of a famous socialist woman in American history, and a southern American socialist woman at that. Her story is amazing, but more importantly, she is historically significant. She is an example to so many people, and she has been liberal-washed for a century, and now she’s being erased entirely. It’s disgusting.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        it’s a nothingburger that people online like to tilt at.

        because they are all brave Knights errant, who are rescuing damsels or something.

        where you around for Bonsai Kittens? lots of people lost their shit over that thinking it was some legit thing.

        • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 days ago

          This is not at all comparable to bonsai kittens. Bonsai kittens were not at all based in reality. Hellen Keller was an actual, real human person who is being erased by idiotic conspiracy theorists. She was a disabled woman who overcame profound disability to become an incredibly example to millions of people, while also being a highly intelligent political thinker. She has been liberal washed for a century, and now she is being erased entirely. It’s not a funny little joke to disregard the accomplishments of someone who represents something that profound to people who are routinely discriminated against. The woman grew up at a time when disabled people were locked away in hospitals, homes, and attics.

          Do you have any idea how utterly insulting it is to see people saying she could not have done what she did, or that she did not even exist, simply because they cannot imagine that a woman with her disabilities could learn language? As if to say that disabled people should be outright rejected because their experience is different from an an able bodied persons?

          This has nothing to do with “rescuing damsels,” and the suggestion that it does is insulting in and of itself. The woman is dead, she cannot rescue herself, she deserves the recognition that she has lost. When she is taught in schools, it’s an abbreviated, liberal washed, abridged few paragraphs, when the reality is that she is one of the most important figures in the American disability rights movement, and one of the most prominent examples of a socialist woman in US history, especially southern American US history.

          • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            dude, idiots think bonsai kittens were real and were going around outraged about it.

            just like idiots think helen keller isn’t real.

            you are taking idiots way too seriously. please go outside and enjoy the sunshine and stop being ragebaited. you are not saving the world by being angry on the internet at stupid people. all you are doing is inflating your own ego and making yourself miserable.

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      A VERY prominent and UNAPOLOGETIC socialist. The way history has defanged her and turned her into a simpleton who learned to speak is an absolute appalling insult to the strong, principled woman she was.

      • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        Exactly! She’s one of my favorite historical figures, but when if she wasn’t, even if our politics did not align so well, she does not deserve to swept into the dustbin like this, liberal washed and eventually erased entirely. It’s disgusting.

        • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          There are absolutely a lot of awful realizations about how inhumanly the world treats people, but the realization that you don’t even get to have the legacy of the life you lived? That’s maybe the most heinous one.

  • coolie4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    What’s this “Helen Keller wasn’t real” meme? I’ve never heard (or seen) it

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 days ago

      You know, I’m very much for equality, but in this situation a woman can do exactly that and get loads of dates.

      It’s the initial connection that is the highest barrier for men, after that, yeah, kinda need to leave the house to get a partner.

  • Sparrow_1029@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    8 days ago

    Years ago, a friend of mine once had: “Seeking partner skilled in armed combat for the coming apocalypse. Must not be averse to cannibalism” as their bio.

    Got 'em a couple DMs I think

  • Malyca@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    8 days ago

    Dating apps are the worst, the absolute worst, way to meet people. I met my husband in a chat room and that’s fucking awful right? Dating apps are worse. Go on blind dates, set your friends up, go and scream in the middle of a park, all of those are better than dating apps. Humans don’t work like catalogues.

  • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    8 days ago

    He’s got a point about carbon copy profiles, they all blur together after a while, and it’s very difficult to find something interesting to talk about in a lot of them.

        • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          it means she isn’t accountable for her actions that drive men away. you are smart to be afraid.

          and on the first date she will tell you how all her exes are awful and it’s your job as her next boyfriend to fix all their mistakes. you basically start out the relationship with her in emotional debt, and you’ll never pay it off with the interest rate she is charging.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    8 days ago

    at least “designed to be deleted” part of it is truthful. Nothing else to be done with that garbage program.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 days ago

    Hinge, Tinder, OkCupid, Plenty Of Fish and others are owned by one giant company called Match.com. You are not ugly, a monopoly just puts you down the pile by algorithm to prompt you to pay to increase your chances of more likes (that’s not to say that making your profile look good doesn’t matter). There are independent dating apps like Coffee and Bagel and Bumble, but either those apps don’t have many people or copying Match’s anti-consumer behaviour like Bumble does.

  • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Dating apps should be publicly funded like a kind of public utility. And private dating apps heavily regulated and prevented from advertising. Because currently they making profit by keeping you single.

    Like water and air, love should not be for profit.

    • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 days ago

      We need 3rd spaces, online dating is just worse in general. People meet at trading card places and card shops because that’s just where people hang out, but that doesn’t exist anywhere else really besides bars.

      People are becoming more isolated and more online, it’s way easier to see if you like someone (and you’ll be exposed to many people) if they happen to be in your vicinity rather than typing in text on a dating app.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        it doesn’t mater, folks social skills have atrophied and their anxiety/depression levels have skyrocketed.

        i do well on dating apps, but most women i meet have poor social skills and mental health problems, and refuse to address/acknowledge them. I’ve also seen this same thing in real life and it’s even worse with generation z. folks just no longer how to assert themselves or communicate. I ran a 3rd space for a decade almost, and basically quit because a few years after pandemic it became weirder and weirder and unstable and hostile folks kept coming and causing problems and blaming other folks for their rudeness.

        you’re not going to be able to form healthy romantic relationships if you refuse to take care of your mental health and practice basic social graces.

      • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        That story makes me think of arranged marriage. Not a fan, but it did have it’s advantages, at least as long as the parents aren’t psycho or marry you off for political or monetary advantage or lands. More experience and more of an eye for the materialistic part of marriage and raising a family. Again not promoting this, there will be untold horror stories of ruined lives there, but I also think part of our modern mindset about romance is probably pathological on opposite ways.

        In the past you were just expected to love your arranged partner - before the idea of “falling in love” became ubiquitous. Love was seen as a more active thing like a craftsmanship that you have to practice every day to get good at it. The feelings then just “grow” over time (see e.g. this book)

        In any case any government interference should be based on well meaning and science based knowledge. Right now the government allows those who own the dating apps influence this essential part of human nature. That is not “non interference”, by not acting to protect people from predatory corporations the government causes harm. Obviously there should be socialist government policy for child rearing (healthcare, maternity leave, financial support, free high quality kindergarden and schools). A lot of stress in relationships can no doubt be traced back to financial stress or “materialist” problems.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        I think they think an app that isn’t being run by a corporation for profit would help them get laid. In theory the government could run and app for this purpose but I don’t think it would work well in practice at least not in the US.

        • Abyssian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Dumb women with low standards for our strong white trash base, make sure smart people never meet each other, and for the attractive minors who sign up lying about their ages… well, I’m sure you know they go to new Presidential sex dungeo… I mean… The “East Wing.”

      • httperrorcode@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        the govt is more likely to have aligned incentives with you when it comes to finding a partner. imo this feels vaguely distopian (not that dating apps don’t)

      • Abyssian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        7 days ago

        I think it’s more that the entire business model of dating apps means they profit from people staying single and looking, not finding long term relationships.

        • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          but that’s not really how they work.

          they have the same business model as most apps, as in all of it comes from a few dumbasses who spend $1000s out of desperation. the vast majority of their users spend nothing.

      • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Hahaha!

        You could have private ones but non-profit. Not sure the size of the minimum network effect though. Probably lower than for social media. Maybe we should add education courses on relationships too. And free therapy. It’s guberment all the way down!

  • cub Gucci@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    8 days ago

    Dating apps belong to a trash can. Hobby is the best place to find a partner. Go to a local meet up to play board games, hike, cycle, jam, improv, debate or whatever. The only way left in the modern world

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      8 days ago

      Hobby is the best place to find a partner.

      no it fucking isn’t. I can 100% guarantee the nerds reading this that your wife isn’t going to appear in the progressive metal moshpit, the netrunner tournament or the climbing center…

      well I mean, that last one has a chance of happening, but don’t hit on women where they exercise for fuck sake. Also, Disregard females, acquire ascents.

      • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Yeah… “Join a hobby group” is the the go-to answer for people who are devoid of ideas but still want to feel helpful.

        Honestly, I think there’s something to be said for going back to “little old lady in the community who matches up young singles.”

      • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 days ago

        Maybe there’s some geographical or cultural differences, but I can say for sure that hobbies is a perfectly normal place to meet women in my area of the US. I have dated plenty of people I’ve met through hobbies.

        Also I think there’s a difference between picking up a woman at a gym vs picking them up at a running or biking meetup. I think just like with anything else, there are inappropriate ways to do it, but it’s not socially unacceptable from my understanding whereas gym pickups really are.

        • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          I think just like with anything else, there are inappropriate ways to do it, but it’s not socially unacceptable from my understanding whereas gym pickups really are.

          yes. I agree with this nuance

          I can say for sure that hobbies is a perfectly normal place to meet women in my area of the US. I have dated plenty of people I’ve met through hobbies.

          the thing to help young men reading this realise isn’t that hobbies are unacceptable, it’s to be wary of going to male dominated spaces and expecting that to count as socialising that will lead you to finding a partner. The promise of feminism of equal gender participation in human affairs still has not been fulfilled.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yeah I think it also must be said that you should befriend women in the hobby. I’ve seen guys who go into hobby spaces and befriend the guys and hit on the women and it doesn’t work out. But when you’re friends with the women you may find yourself connecting with one, or being set up by your friends.

      • KuroiKaze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        I don’t know almost every couple I know met because they were at something that they both were interested in. If all your hobbies include absolutely zero women, then maybe you should have a real long look at yourself And take a chance on some stuff that’s outside your comfort zone. There’s nothing of value that can be gained without challenge.

    • FunnySalt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I met my soon to be wife on a dating app. You might think from that opening sentence that I’m about to extol the virtues of dating apps. I am not. They are garbage, so I agree the trash can is the best place.

      This was during covid lockdowns, so no social opportunities, and I had recently moved to a new area and didn’t know anyone nearby. So seemed the only option, terrible as it is. And yeah it worked out for me, but that’s beating the odds. It was an unpleasant experience and was thrilled to be done with it. But, it might be a similar situation for others. No better option seemingly available.

      That said, prior to that, I attended a lot of meetups via meetup.com and had a fair bit of luck dating through that. And regardless of if I met someone or not at any given thing, I had fun.

    • Fleppensteyn@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      Depends where you live. In my current city there are almost no women going to those kinds of meetups and the city I grew up in is so dead there just aren’t any events like that.

    • PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Flea markets, anyone? There are several big ones in my area, occurring regularly. I go several times a year and it’s always so much fun when I do. And it’s very easy to chat people up.